type here...
Home Blog Page 85

Champions League Round Up: The Students Still Have a Lot to Learn

Common Sense Contributors
-
0

By Jireh Antwi

Juventus and Real Madrid proved last week why the master is still in charge and the student still has a lot to learn. Tottenham Hotspurs and Paris Saint-Germain showed a lack of experience in their Champions League campaign this year.   

Champions League Logo – http://img.uefa.com/imgml/2016/ucl/social/og-default.jpg 

PSG with the acquisitions they got this summer, such as record transfer fee signings of Neymar and Kylian Mbappe were looking to take the Champions league by storm. In the group stages, they showcased their display of talent and dominance. With the last 16 stages being picked and them being drawn against Real Madrid, it would be the first opportunity for them to be tested and cement themselves as a powerhouse in this competition against the previous Champions. 

With the French team’s chances already slim, as result of the first leg where they lost 3-1 to Real Madrid.  The second leg at the Parc de Princes proved to be a tough challenge, with their star player Neymar being injured against their rivals Ligue 1 side Marseille a few days earlier. He suffered a fractured metatarsal and a sprained ankle with no estimated time for his return.  

Alas, Real Madrid didn’t even need their star players to see them through to the quarter-final. They achieved a 2-1 win with the likes of Bale and Kroos being substituted on rather than starting and their best midfielder Modric not even playing.  With a goal from Cristiano Ronaldo in the 51st minute making the match for PSG an uphill challenge, especially with Marco Verratti being sent off with a red card at the 66th minute mark, Cavani the striker equalised for PSG even with ten men.  However, a second goal from Casemiro at the 80th minute sealed the game for Real Madrid.  

Real Madrid win

Casemiro and Ronaldo both secured goals against PSG (source: AFP)

Now there are questions to be asked what PSG should do going forward? Do they need to go back to the drawing board? All their star players didn’t step up and tactically they looked lacklustre and it looked like Real Madrid were fairly comfortable throughout the game.  On paper, PSG are better than most teams in the world but if they can’t win when it really matters, then that’s a problem. There are also rumours of Neymar looking for an exit back to Barcelona, which is sure to cause distress in the PSG camp.  

 

Tottenham Hotspurs vs Juventus   

Tottenham Hotspurs away tie to Juventus in the first leg was a very interesting game, Juventus managed to score 2 goals form Higuaín within the first 10 minutes of the game, it looked to be all over before it had even started. A Harry Kane goal at the 35th minute looked to be a consolation in the first half, in the end, Eriksen’s goal at the 71st minute gave them two crucial away goals and the lead. If they replicated such a performance at Wembley it would have seen them through to the quarter-finals.

Paulo Dybala of Juventus celebrates scoring his side's second goal

 Dybala celebrating after scoring the killer goal, to end Tottenham’s Champions’ League dreams. (Source: Getty Images) 

However, what looked like it was going to be a dominant performance by Spurs going 1-0 up in the 39th minute from Son Heung-min and the team having several shots on goal. However, Juventus’ substitution of Ghanaian Kwadwo Asamoah for Stephan Lichtsteiner and the changing of the back 3 defence into a back 4, allowed Juventus to have more width. This tactical change was a catalyst for Juventus’ victory. Almost immediately, in the space of 4 mins, Higuaín and Dybala scored goals at the 64th and 67th minute, capitalising on two big mistakes by Tottenham.  This really dented Spurs’ spirit and morale and they couldn’t equalise to take the game to extra time.   

The vast amount of experience showed in the Juventus side to see the game out through the end with Giorgio Chiellini commenting that ‘Tottenham have always created many chances to score – but they miss always something at the end’.  Chiellini’s quote is indicative to their Premiere league title challenge in the 2015/16 season where they came up short against Chelsea to allow Leicester city to win the Premier League Champions.  With Spurs always getting there but not quite making it, how long can the club keep their star players before they decide to go to bigger clubs that consistently challenge and win? And how long before Real Madrid come knocking for Harry Kane’s services?

PSG definitely have another attempt next year as they’re set to win their domestic league. Likewise, can Tottenham hold out long enough for a top 4 finish, to secure their place in next year’s Champions league?  

 

 

 

 

  

  

Birmingham ACS: Political Correctness Gone Wrong or Much Needed Diversity?

Common Sense Contributors
-
0
Birmingham ACS: Political Correctness Gone Wrong or Much Needed Diversity?

This week, Birmingham Univiersitys ACS ( Afro-Caribbean Society) came under fire for allowing a non Afro-Caribbean student to run for a position on the ACS committee. Our journalists Muhammed Oleolo and Munya Raradza give their views on the scandal.

No Door Should Ever Be Closed at University – In Defence of Dita

by Muhammed Oleolo

So this girl, Dita, has apparently done the unthinkable. She’s encroached on a space meant for black people exclusively. She, in merely announcing her running for the role of Secretary of the University of Birmingham’s African-Caribbean Society, has chosen to occupy a space that was not her’s to take.
I don’t buy that point of view for a second.  In fact, the people attacking her right to run are playing a very dangerous game.  I’ve worked on successive ACS committees and I can say that in my experience, I have seen few stand for a position with a motivation as altruistic as this:

That’s not to say I am personally excited by her platform. Is there something extremely cringed about the phrase, “intergration & unity”? Absolutely! Does “cultural awareness” actually mean anything? We shall see.
My point is that the very nature of university is that it opens doors to the wider world. Who are we to close any of those doors on people, especially without hearing them out.  One could say, she has a right to run, but she’s unfairly taking one of the very few positions of leadership that black people occupy on campus.

There are two reasons why I disagree. First of all, finding a place on a university society is often a democratically acquired office. The only requirement is to be a member and to do one’s job diligently. There’s nothing about being white that precludes one from executing a secretarial role for the ACS effectively. Secondly, ACS is not a monolithic cultural society in essence but operates that way de facto. Would we have the same outrage for White Africans? Arab Africans? Perhaps people that don’t look stereotypically Bantu or West African like Habeshis and Somalis? Almost certainly, most ACS’ are cultural only in that they serve as a link-up spot on campus for the Nigerian and Ghanaian diaspora. Most ACS committees need to depart from the London-based, West-African Christian Identity that they embody in order to embrace the pan-cultural ethic they are meant to embody.

A voice speaking in a different tune to everyone else is never a bad thing. Let Dita stand and we’ll see if her vision can bring diversity to the mono cultural ACS landscape!

 

Sorry Dita There’s a Waiting List

Munya J. Raradza

In recent days, the debacle over a white student running for a secretary role in Birmingham’s ACS sparked a lot of reaction on twitter. It caused many black students to reflect and think about the significance of Afro-Caribbean societies within UK universities. As an alumna of the university, the events that unfolded were frankly embarrassing. It was a shame to see my ACS mistake people’s criticisms, for hate speech or bullying. On one hand, I agree with the society’s stance to allow for any paid member to run for a committee position. However, there is a bigger question at hand. Why would such an individual feel responsible for spreading ‘cultural awareness’ for an ethnic group of which she is not part of? Supposedly, all in the name of ‘integration’ and ‘unity’.

Yes, this particular student may have all the administrative skills needed to fulfil the duties of this role. However, is she ideally suited for it? No. Although, many Afro-Caribbean students primarily join their university’s ACS to make friends and party, the society also has social/political duties as well. Whilst I was at the university, the ACS organised a plethora of career events. Highlighting to me a demand for black talent within a variety of industry sectors. They proved to be extremely helpful. In the organisation of such events, what insight can a white student offer? What about when black students become victims of racism and prejudice. As what was suffered by a black student at Nottingham Trent University. What practical advice can she offer to help the committee address these issues? As ACS secretary, part of her role will be to inform students of such opportunities, as well as make them aware of such instances.

I am sure she means well. But it is clear that her cultural experience is incompatible with furthering the cause of Birmingham’s ACS. It is not invalid, but it is definitely incompatible. ACS’s were created in the spirit of ‘integration’ and ‘unity’ primarily amongst black students within UK universities. Of which, there is still a plentiful amount of work that needs to be done. Frankly, we still need to get more Carribean and Afro-Latino students involved in such societies. As well as improve black Muslim representation and also integrate black LGBT students. So sorry ‘Dita’, I’m afraid there’s a waiting list.

 

UPDATE: Since these articles were written, Dita has tweeted the following:

Would you like to join in on the conversation? Have your say on Twitter. 

Is Trudeau losing his Magic?

Alex Davenport
-
3
Is Trudeau losing his Magic?

Justin Trudeau’s political rise has been meteoric. The son of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau burst onto the political scene in 2013, when he won the leadership of the Liberal Party with over 80% of the vote. His most remarkable feat came at the 2015 federal election, when he steered his party from having third-most seats in the House of Commons, and being third in the polls even at the start of the campaign, to winning an overall majority, becoming Prime Minister in the process.

Since taking power he has remained popular among Canadians. Through a combination of appearance, charisma and policy, he has developed a substantial and dedicated online following and can make the news with anything from his views on feminism to his choice of socks. As well as this, since the election of Donald Trump in 2016, Trudeau has carved out a successful identity as his antithesis in many ways. Trudeau has portrayed himself as tolerant, progressive and charismatic, while in the eyes of many Trump is the polar opposite of these things; Trump retweets anti-Islamic videos from neofascists, while Trudeau breaks down in tears meeting Syrian refugees. In a country which prides itself on being more liberal-minded than its immediate neighbour, this has gone down particularly well.

However, all is not well in Trudeau’s court. He recently embarked on an error-strewn trip to India, which was apparently as high on family photo opportunities as it was low on substantive meetings and official business, making the state visit seem like a family holiday. If that were not bad enough, it later emerged that a radical Sikh separatist by the name of Jaspal Atwal, who had been convicted for attempting to assassinate an Indian cabinet minister in 1986, had been invited to official events held during the visit. Awkwardly for Trudeau, pictures even emerged of Atwal posing alongside his wife Sophie Grégoire, leading to questions of how such a breach of security protocol took place.

The controversial India visit is unlikely to help his party’s position in the polls, which is already beginning to look under threat. Since the Liberal Party’s election victory in 2015, they have led the opinion polls almost without fail, often by margins of up to 20 percentage points. However, their main rivals, the Conservatives, are starting to catch up and even overtake the Liberals in recent opinion polls, with aggregations giving the Conservatives a slight lead overall. Such ratings cannot help but beg the question of whether Trudeau has turned out, as some have argued, to be a politician of style over substance, nailing every speech and photo opportunity but offering very little in terms of tangible policy differences.

The Trudeaus at the Taj Mahal, one of the much-maligned photo opportunities during the state visit (Source: NDTV)

Yet it should be noted that his own approval ratings are strongly ahead of those of his party, along with the fact that Canadians still hold a significantly higher opinion of Trudeau than any of his rival party leaders. Judging by these statistics, it appears that Trudeau remains a popular figure. It may then be the case that the Liberals’ declining poll ratings are more a result of other, less popular members of the party, such as Finance Minister Bill Morneau, whose tax proposals for small businesses angered significant sections of the electorate.

Also, as next year’s election approaches, it would not be surprising for us to see the Liberals’ ratings rise again. For one, this is the usual cycle of support for parties in power, with support increasing at the end of a term of office as many voters compare them with possible governments led by other parties and decide to opt with the devil they know. Also, as the 2019 election campaign takes shape, Trudeau as a party leader will increasingly take the limelight in representing the Liberals, which can only be a good thing for them given his continuing popularity and his natural ability as a campaigner; you only need to look at his turnaround at the previous election to see what he is capable of during a campaign. While he and his party should not take this wobble lightly, Trudeau’s Liberals do not have the feel of a one-term government about them.

Anok Yai, the First Black Model to Open a Prada Runway in Over Two Decades

Common Sense Contributors
-
0

By Deborah Adeniyi.

  • Anok Yai, 19 year old college student, became the first black woman to open Prada’s runway show in over two decades since Naomi Campbell did so in 1997.  
  • The 19 year old was discovered through social media where a picture of her quickly became viral causing the industry to take her under wing. 
  • Yai was only aware that she would be heading the showcase an hour before the show commenced. 

 

In an interview with Refinery29, Yai revealed, “I’ve always wanted to model since I was young, but I didn’t know how to get into the industry.” Yai was discovered after a photo of her at Howard University’s homecoming celebration went viral on social media platform, Twitter. Vogue’s contributing casting director, Ashley Brokaw took charge in securing Yai’s booking for the Italian luxury fashion brand. A few months after being scouted she was able to make her ground breaking debut, opening at Prada’s Menswear Fall 2018 show. 

Yai told Vogue, “I will remember the experience of opening the show as my breakthrough moment. Just modelling for Prada alone is a huge opportunity and the fact that Miuccia and Ashley put me front and centre sets the tone for my career.” Yai is now signed with Next Models and is currently working exclusively with Prada this season. This opportunity has allowed the Egyptian born , Sudanese model to quickly build up an extremely strong portfolio which now boasts of three Prada campaigns and two shows. 

 

Yai’s success is a step forward when looking at diversity within the fashion industry. Traditionally, and even up until recent years the fashion industry has struggled with pushing models that show a wide spectrum of culture and ethnicity. It is only now that we have seen a push on diversity within fashion with brands such as Coach, Miu Miu and Dolce and Gabanna recently diversifying their 2017/18 campaigns. Yai told Vogue, “It was an honour and I’m proud that I was the one chosen to open, but this is bigger than me. Me opening for one of the top fashion houses is a statement to the world – especially for black women – that their beauty is something that deserves to be celebrated,” she told Vogue of the moment. Despite this step forward, it is clear that more work needs to be done in order to have more racial diversity across the fashion industry as women of colour only accounted for 37.3 % of all castings at this season’s Fall 2018 New York Fashion Week. Essentially the fashion industry is making progress and is heading in the right direction however; it needs to be questioned how quickly will these changes become normality in fashion. Will it be a another twenty years until we are graced with the next Anok Yai? 

 

Deborah is a first year university student studying Fashion Buying and Merchandising at the University of Manchester. Her interests lay in textiles, fashion, contemporary visual arts and fashion business. Her Nigerian roots alongside her upbringing in South East London, have shaped her perspective on cultural issues allowing her to express both liberal and traditional stances on various current affairs. 

Twitter: @deborah_aden 

PFA Player of the Year: The Case for Mo Salah

Common Sense Contributors
-
0

By Mike Banks.

Kevin de Bruyne and Mo Salah are the two frontrunners for the PFA Player of the Year going this season, and understandably so. Both players have been in sensational form. Kevin de Bruyne has been the standout performer for the swashbuckling champions-elect Manchester City, while Mo Salah is arguably the most in-form wide forward in European football.

The likelihood is that de Bruyne will win the award, but I want to make the case for Mo Salah.

When he was signed by Liverpool last summer, few would have expected him to have the impact that he has had. The stats make for handsome reading for the Egyptian. He has scored 24 goals in just 28 Premier League games and 32 goals in all competitions. This includes goals against every other team in the Premier League’s top 6 this season, bar Manchester United – and he has the chance to change this when Liverpool play Manchester United on Saturday. In fact, including United, Salah has only failed to score against 4 of the Premier League sides he has faced this season – Brighton, Swansea City and Crystal Palace being the other three.

In the 2007/08 season, Cristiano Ronaldo scored 42 goals in all competitions for Manchester United – 31 of these coming in the Premier League. Salah is on course to match and possibly exceed these numbers with 9 Premier League games still to be played.

He has already scored more goals in a season for Liverpool than Luis Suarez, Michael Owen and Daniel Sturridge and he is only one goal behind Fernando Torres’ best tally for the Reds. What is notable about this is that these players are all out-and-out center forwards, Mo Salah is not. He has also provided a respectable 8 assists in the league, a number bettered by only 4 other players, meaning he has been involved in more goals than any other Premier League player this season – 32.

Mo Salah celebrates opening the scoring against Spurs at Anfield (Source: Liverpool FC)

His performances back up these stats. This isn’t a player who is productive, but offers very little else to his team. He is a tireless runner, who is willing to do the dirty work whenever required.

Whether it’s slaloming past three defenders and scoring, a routine one-on-one finish, or an effort from 25-yards out, Salah appears capable of scoring virtually every goal possible. He has performed to such a level, that his very presence now strikes fear into the hearts of defenders.

His detractors will point to the fact that he has missed more big chances than any other player in the Premier League this season (19), but even the very best goal-scorers can be profligate at times. Harry Kane, who is already regarded as one of the finest finishers of this generation, has missed 16 big chances in the Premier League this season, while players like Cristiano Ronaldo and Luis Suarez have been criticised for occasionally being wasteful in front of goal.

His detractors might also highlight his supposed overreliance on pace, but this has been overstated. Teams often set-up against Liverpool with a low-block, but Salah’s incredible movement and goal-scoring instincts mean that he has regularly scored against these sides.

Salah has transformed himself from a Chelsea ‘flop’ to a superstar and you get the feeling that there is more to come from the Egyptian King.

 

Mike is a Politics PhD student and takes a keen interest in social issues, all things British politics and Liverpool FC. He is also a born-again Christian, and one of his favourite bible verses is Matthew 6:33.

Twitter: @mxkes_

Seven Years of Bombardment for the Syrian People

Common Sense Contributors
-
0

By Ruth Foster.

The 15th of March 2018 will mark the seventh year of civil war in Syria. As of February 2018, the Syrian Government held 55.1% of Syrian territories while 11.4% was controlled by rebel groups – the remaining areas are controlled by the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria (SDF) and ISIL.

Although the international meeting on Syria in Kazakhstan in 2017 made some believe that the conflict was coming to an end, in the past few weeks a very different story has come out of Ghouta – the informal name for suburbs of the capital of Syria, Damascus, that has been held by rebels since the beginning of the conflict. On the 2nd of March 2018 the United Nations reported that “war crimes, potentially crimes against humanity, are likely being committed in east Ghouta and elsewhere in Syria”, with around 400,000 civilians trapped and facing the terror of airstrikes and reported release of toxic agents. As a convoy of 46 trucks carrying health and nutrition supplies was due to arrive to the besieged victims of this terror on 5th March 2018 – the question remains of when and how will the civil war in Syria end?

Syrian Refugee Crisis

After the deaths of approximately 250,000 Syrians and displacement of millions, the sectarian nature of the conflict in Syria means that the obvious solution would be partition, with the creation of various new states defined along ethnic and sectarian lines. However, history shows us that the obvious solution is by no means the right one – in many ways it may not even end the conflict in Syria.

Partitioning countries to achieve peace has been used throughout the twentieth century. Scholars like Chaim Kaufmann have argued that this solution works perfectly in theory, solving the ethnic security dilemma through the physical division of land and ethnic groups. However, recent examples show that such a simplistic view and solution to a complex situation has the power to perpetuate the conflict itself. In order to work for long-term stability in a region, partition of a state is not the solution. For example, since the partition of Sudan and creation of independent state South Sudan in 2011, more than 2 million Sudanese people have been displaced with an estimated 5 million of those who remain in South Sudan requiring food assistance in 2017. For the international community looking at Syria, there needs to be a focus on mediation that considers the fragile nature of the shaky state borders established at the end of the First World War.

South Sudan 2011 © Gaël Turine / VU

In order to protect the civilians and prevent further bloodshed, physical partition along ethnic lines cannot be seen as an option, and the Syrian people can no longer be treated as collateral damage. So far, problems have occurred over the course of mediation efforts due to questions of legitimacy, state capacity and the protection of civilians. After nearly seven years of bombardment, being used as pawns by the global superpowers, it is time for the Syrian peoples’ lives and livelihoods to be taken as priority if a stable, peaceful, and united Syria is to be seen in the near future

 

Ruth is a final year undergraduate student at the University of Edinburgh, originally from Northern Ireland. Her aim in life is to try and make the world a little bit better and care about important issues affecting real people, which includes (but is in no way limited to) storytelling, politics, culture, and coffee.

Open vs. Closed: The New Divide?

Alex Davenport
-
0
Open vs. Closed: The New Divide?

A recent study published by Global Future has concluded that the divide between supporters of Labour and the Conservatives at the 2017 UK general election was characterised by differing attitudes to the outside world. Where previously the economic left-right spectrum appeared most important in deciding voters’ preferences, such a division has arguably been eclipsed by issues such as immigration, the EU and foreign aid. While the importance of these issues has been increasing for several years in the UK, Brexit has certainly sped up the issue, bringing it to the forefront of public debate.

The authors of the study suggest this represents a redrawing of voters’ loyalties, making them more likely to swing from one party to another than ever before. Those with a more internationalist identity and a positive view of immigration tend to be younger, better educated and located in urban areas, while those with a more nationalistic outlook are generally older, and living in either rural areas, or traditionally working-class heartlands which have suffered from the UK’s industrial decline. Voters’ wealth, meanwhile, seems to be less influential than it has been previously in deciding which party they vote for. This explains some of the surprising results we saw in June last year, with Labour winning in the affluent yet urban Kensington, while the Conservatives gained in traditionally Labour-supporting working-class areas such as Stoke-on-Trent.

An election graphic showing the narrow margins of Labour’s unexpected victory in Kensington (Source: Daily Mirror)

What’s more, is that this trend is certainly not confined to the UK. Across Europe and North America, globalisation is redrawing the political battle lines. The French election is a classic example of this – the two traditionally leading parties, the Socialists and the Republicans, both failed to get past the first round of voting, perhaps representing the outdated nature of the left-right platform on which they have always fought elections. Instead the final stand-off was between the liberal Emmanuel Macron and far-right Marine Le Pen, representing almost perfectly the growing struggle between ‘Open’ and ‘Closed’ worldviews. There have also been similar developments in many other European countries, such as Germany, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic in recent years. In many such cases, we have seen the rise of far-right parties, whose rhetoric has elicited strong reactions among their more liberal-minded counterparts, setting the tone for the political competition that followed.

Let us also not forget the success of Donald Trump, one of the best examples of this new ‘Open-Closed’ divide. Looking back to the 2016 presidential election campaign, it certainly wasn’t Trump’s views on economic issues which garnered most attention and discussion. Instead it was his nationalistic, ‘build-a-wall’ rhetoric that defined much of the debate with Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. It was also likely this rhetoric that won him over conventionally Democrat-leaning voters in former industrial states such as Michigan and Ohio, further testament to the shifting allegiances we are witnessing.

Donald Trump with opponent Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate (Source: AP)

This is certainly not to say that traditional ‘left-right’ issues do not apply to people or politics any more. The popularity of politicians such as Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders proves that there is still an appetite for classical left-wing policies of state intervention in the economy, particularly among the young.

The interaction between these older issues and the newer ones may prove interesting. It may be the case that the likes of Corbyn and Sanders, for example, should combine their left-wing politics with an open, internationalist message in order to maximise their potential support base. Yet while this may fit together well on some issues, such as an openness and tolerance regarding immigration and multiculturalism, other elements may not sit together as comfortably. For example, left-leaning politicians may not look as favourably on internationalism when it comes to free trade agreements, going against their own protectionist instincts. The conventional Right and the ‘Closed’ side of the new divide also have their own inconsistencies: for one, the benefits immigration can bring to a free-market economy. Whether the open-closed divide usurps the classic left-right one or not, or some confused mess of the two emerges, it is certainly interesting to consider what our own priorities are when choosing who to vote for.

Safe Shoes to Wear in Cold and Slippery Weather

Common Sense Contributors
-
0

By Hannah Bamgbala.

Although the worst is behind us for those in London and the South of England, in these recent terrible weather conditions, it’s important that we know how to stay well protected. So, how well have you been protecting your feet? Snow and ice can be extremely dangerous and slippery, especially if you aren’t wearing the correct shoes to keep yourself safe.

Here are a few simple shoe options for this recent snowy weather, and even if not for now, it’ll come in handy the next time you’re considering a winter ski vacay.

1. Wellington boots

These shoes are mostly worn in rainy weather conditions. They are long and water proof, protecting your feet and a certain length of your legs from getting wet in the rain. These shoes are also good for the snow because they have a surprisingly strong and structured grip underneath to prevent slipping.

2. Timberlands

This particular shoe is always in and out of trend, so it’s great to have a pair, especially for both winter and summer. They are strong shoes that are protective in harsh environments and also cover your ankles. They are great for snowy and icy weather and have a fantastic grip structure under the shoe to provide stability when walking. Although they are a bit pricey, you don’t necessarily have to buy this particular brand, as many shops sell similar versions for less.

4. Snow boots and Mountain boots

Snow boots and mountain boots, aren’t the best looking footwear and may not be in fashion, but they are both fantastic shoes for snowy and icy weather. Real mountain boots are designed to conserve heat, making them particularly warm inside. The grip underneath also makes it nearly impossible to slip and fall. You will also find that most come up above your ankles to lock in that extra bit of heat.

5. Trainers

Last but not least is trainers. There are honestly so many brilliant trainers that have been designed for multiple purposes, but they’ve become such a fashion statement we tend to not see their versatility. Some are built for comfort but the good ones are built to last and provide great balance. Of course, not all trainers are designed for though weather but there are some good ones with well designed grips, water proof material and good support to get you through the snow.

All in all, if you are unfortunate enough to still be battling the cold and wet weather, make sure that your choice in footwear has a good amount of grip underneath and are of course water proof.

 

And don’t forget your socks!

Hannah Bamgbala was born in London and is of Nigerian descent. She is passionate about freedom of expression in both Africa and photography. Hannah is currently a Fashion Media and Promotion student at The University For The Creative Arts Rochester and is looking to pursue journalism, photography and styling once she graduates.

 

A Wild Wilder

Common Sense Contributors
-
0
A Wild Wilder

by Akwasi Appiah

Deontay ‘Broze Bomber’ Wilder KO’d Cuban Heavyweight Luiz Ortiz in the 10th round. Ortiz, dubbed King Kong, was ahead on the cards at the Barclaycard Centre in New York, and almost knocked out Wilder in the 7th round. But Wilder (32 years old) showed resolve and toughness by coming through the storm to knock out Ortiz (38 years old) in the 10th round. The win means that the ‘Bronze Bomber’ has knocked out all 40 men who have faced him, many in the first round itself.

The fight started slow with both fighters acting with caution. Ortiz, the left-handed southpaw and Wilder, the right-handed orthodox fighter both pumped crisp jabs to line up their strong backhands. Boo’s began to ring from the crowd by the 4th round, but this only served as ignition for the fight and made it into the barnstormer it was. At the end of the 5th round a straight right wobbled Ortiz and staggered him. He was lucky to be saved by the bell.

https://twitter.com/EtremeFan/status/970166019015757825

However the 7th round became the talking point of the fight. Both fighters landed their punches at the same time but Ortiz had greater effect. Wilder held on until the end of the round, but it was the first time since turning professional in 2008 that we have seen Wilder in trouble.

https://twitter.com/punchdrunkpauly/status/970150501479211008

The fight was closed out in the 10th round. Having displayed tremendous fitness to recover by the 8th Wilder started to apply more and more pressure. And ultimately the pressure paid off and in the 10th round he clipped the Cuban with a sweet right hand. Ortiz beat the count but this was to be his last act of bravery. Wilder once again caught Ortiz and referee David Fields instantly declared King Kong unfit to continue.

The implications of Wilders win are huge. It increases pressure for the showdown with him and Joshua to come to fruition by the end of the year. Wilder showed he is able to come through adversity, and has a solid chin. But questions still remain as to whether his lack of boxing ability, will stand up to a young and fresh fighter who has more gears than the elderly Ortiz.

Also on the weekend Kell Brook defeated Sergei Rabchenko in his first fight after back-to-back defeats to Gennady Gennadyevich Golovkin often dubbed GGG and American superstar Errol Spence Jr. A sweet uppercut finished the affair in the second round and leaves Brook in a healthy position to challenge once again for a world title at 154lbs.

Sergey Kovalev and Dmitry Bivol have also had notable wins over Igor Mikhalkin and Sullivan Barerra respectively.

 

 Akwasi Appiah is a 3rd year Economics student at Queen Mary University. He has a strong passion for talent development and music. He has his own blog ‘akwasiappiah.com’ and has written for discussion outlets such as @OGGM_ and @DesiringGod.

Revolution, Patriotism and the Second Amendment

Alex Davenport
-
1
Revolution, Patriotism and the Second Amendment

A quote from an old episode of The Simpsons has recently been circulating in response to the fierce debate on gun control taking place in the USA. In the episode ‘The Cartridge Family’, which, despite being over 20 years old remains as bitingly satirical now as it was then, Homer is trying to justify buying a handgun to his incredulous family. When Lisa tries to point out that the Second Amendment is a remnant from a bygone era, Homer corrects her by pointing out that if he didn’t have his gun, “the King of England could just walk in here and start pushing you around!” This is obviously meant as a bizarre and ridiculous statement, but it also sums up how influential the country’s revolutionary past remains in understanding why it retains such a fondness for firearms.

The America’s founding fathers specifically included the right to bear arms in their newly designed constitution with their war with the British in mind. They saw their revolution against their oppressors as a struggle against tyranny, fighting back against an arbitrary government infringing on the rights of its citizens by forcing ‘taxation without representation’ upon them. Having an armed group of civilians, they argued, ensures that if government oversteps its boundaries, it will be met with fierce resistance.

Yet constitutions can be changed. The main reason the possession of guns remains so widespread is less because a mistrust of government underpins American political institutions, than because it underpins American identity. In many ways, the Revolutionary War mindset has been ingrained in the national psyche. The defining moment of the country, the one which brought it into being, was a struggle against tyranny; a struggle which was enabled by the use of firearms.

A depiction of the Battle of Long Island, during the American Revolutionary War (Source: history.com)

This is why individual liberty is at the heart of American patriotism. Perhaps more than any other country, the concept of ‘freedom’ and all that comes with it, is heavily glorified and often intrinsically linked with what it means to be American. For many (though certainly not all), guns represent an emotional, even symbolic link to a freedom won centuries ago. Being armed allows free citizens to protect themselves from the government, and any attempts by the government to meddle in gun ownership rights are perfect evidence of the kind of tyranny that make it so essential for people to keep their guns in the first place. That it would probably take a lot more than guns to keep a modern government, with its tanks, bombs and drones, in check is somewhat beside the point for proponents of gun ownership.

This appeal to specific political values of old is not something we can strongly relate to in the UK. In contrast to America, Britain is a country formed by evolution rather than revolution. This means we don’t have any particular moment which provides the political basis of our society; no one historical ideal to be emulated like the USA’s promotion of freedom and suspicion of government. This may be why the idea of widely accessible firearms, so intuitive to many Americans, is so alien to Brits as well as many other foreigners.

Whether America’s strong attachment to history when it comes to firearms is a good thing or not is a matter for fierce debate across the country, particularly in the wake of a tragedy like the one experienced in Florida. Either way, though, Homer Simpson is right to point the finger at the King of England as the source of America’s passion for guns.

Tribalism and the Fight Against Racism in English Football

Common Sense Contributors
-
0

By Michael Banks.

Tribalism is inhibiting the fight against racism in English football. The automatic response of some clubs and fans when their player is accused of racism is to leap to the defence of their player, and in the case of some fans, abuse the accuser/alleged victim. Brighton left-back, Gaetan Bong, was subject to abuse on social media from West Brom fans after he accused their forward, Jay Rodriguez, of racially abusing him. This is why players are often shy to speak up about racism; fear they may be abused or accused of playing the ‘race card’.  

In 2011, both Chelsea and Liverpool chose to inexplicably back their players, John Terry and Luis Suarez, when both were accused of racism. Both clubs appeared to prioritise their players over the fight against racism in football. Liverpool, in particular, dealt with allegations against Suarez horrendously and their staunch and defiant defence of the Uruguayan, even after he was found guilty, made me feel extremely uncomfortable as a black Liverpool fan.  

Liverpool, to their credit, handled the recent Firmino/Holgate situation with much more class and decorum, releasing a statement after the game in which they said that they would fully cooperate with the investigation. It appears lessons were learnt from the Suarez/Evra debacle and Firmino, in particular, should be applauded for allowing the investigation to run its course before commenting. 

 

Liverpool’s Uruguayan forward Luis Suárez (L) exchanges words with Manchester United’s French defender Patrice Evra during the English Premier League football match between Liverpool and Manchester United. French and British media quoted Evra after the game as telling French broadcaster Canal & that Suarez had racially abused him several times during the match. AFP PHOTO / ANDREW YATES
 (Photo credit: ANDREW YATES/AFP/Getty Images)

Whilst Liverpool’s senior staff, management and players have learnt from the Suarez/Evra debacle, it appears a sizeable minority of their fans have not. Some Liverpool fans want Mason Holgate to be punished retrospectively because he dared to accuse one of their players of racially abusing him. The investigation found that Holgate’s accusation was made in good faith, the Brazilian striker has been exonerated, and that should be that.  

The fact that Holgate is being investigated by the Football Association (FA) for inappropriate tweets from over 5 years ago does not sit well with me, as these tweets were dug-up by Liverpool fans trying to smear his name in the direct aftermath of his accusation against Firmino. I’m in no way justifying his tweets, but they would not have been dug-up had he not accused the Liverpool striker of racially abusing him. Why is the first reaction of some fans to defend their player instead of feeling some sympathy for the accuser? After all, racist abuse can be extremely damaging to the mental wellbeing of the victim. Liverpool youngster Rhian Brewster recently spoke of the emotional toll the racist abuse he has suffered had on him.  

Liverpool players supported Kick It Out – an organisation that plays a central role in the fight against racism in English football – prior to their 4-1 win against West Ham last Saturday, only to be let down by a section of their fans taunting Patrice Evra by singing the name of Luis Suarez in the first-half of the game. Evra’s every touch was booed and jeered by some throughout the game. This was justified by some, claiming that they were booing the Frenchman because he was a former Manchester United player, but Liverpool have played against several ex-Manchester United players this season and none were on the receiving end of such treatment. 

 

Evra Anfield – REUTERS/Peter Powell 

The fact that there are still a significant number of Liverpool fans who believe that the former Manchester United left-back was not racially abused is bemusing. The FA carried out a thorough investigation into the matter and it was found that the former Liverpool striker used the word ‘negro’ SEVEN times in around 2 minutes during an exchange between the pair on the 15th October 2011 in a game at Anfield. In a 115-page report released by the FA following the verdict, it was noted that the evidence provided by Suarez was ‘unreliable’ and ‘inconsistent’, whilst Evra was described as a ‘credible witness’. 

The evidence is conclusive. Nevertheless, some Liverpool fans are putting tribalism and their loyalty to the club and a former player above fairness and justice. This is counterproductive and not only undermines the progression made by the club in tackling and dealing with racism, but the very core values of the city of Liverpool. Fans of all clubs need to put tribalism to one side, and realise that tackling racism in football is far more important. 

 

Mike is a Politics PhD student and takes a keen interest in social issues, all things British politics and Liverpool FC. 

Twitter: @mxkes_ 

Samsung S9 and S9+: A Guide

Common Sense Contributors
-
0
Samsung S9 and S9+: A Guide

by Jireh Antwi

The Samsung S9 & S9+ is here and it’s Samsung’s best shot at creating a superior camera. Or as they’re dubbing it ‘The Camera. Reimagined.’


In fact, it’s meant to be a direct competitor to the IPhoneX. Samsung devices have a long run of having excellent cameras so for the company to take it to the next level is exciting for a consumer to see.

The S9 bodes a dual rear camera with the ability to take super bright day light photos and super low light photos with the dual aperture feature which works like a human eye to adjust to lighting levels allowing you to have crisp and clear photos and can switch between F1.5 and F2.4 modes (If its dark the lens opens up to F1.5 mode and pulls in the light for bright and clear photos) (in daylight the lens switches to F2.4 mode to help your picture come out sharp). Also features a 8MP front camera.

A more improved slow motion capturing rate at 960 frames per second which allows you to create some fun moments, you can also use these slow-motion pieces as a lock screen or create gifs.

The S9 also features an Exynos Processor making it perform faster than the S8, however it still has the same screen size as the S8 with the edge to edge display. Up to 400gb of external storage available with an SD card.  Water and dust resistant like its predecessors and comes with wireless charging as usual. Upgraded AKG speakers with 1.4x more powerful performance than previous Galaxy phones as Samsung are claiming.  Along with Dolby Atmos which provides an immersed sound experience.

The positioning of the fingerprint sensor on the back has also changed, now being below the camera rather at the side, this improves the overall hand held feel and a improved scanning feature for iris and facial  recognition when unlocking of your phone.

If you’re wondering it’s a yes, the Samsung S9 series still has a headphone jack.  Samsung aren’t parting ways with that necessity just yet.

Some other interesting new features is the AR Avatar – by taking a selfie you can create an augmented reality emoji of yourself and send it as videos and photos and in chats. It’s basically a version of the Apple Animoji. Likewise, the new colour options of Coral blue and Lilac purple is an addition to the previous S8 colourways, however they aren’t going down a treat as they aren’t necessarily attractive colours for everyday use or compared to its competitors.

Let us know what you think of the Samsung Galaxy S9 & S9+ and if you consider it a big enough upgrade to part with your device.

 

Jireh is a Microbiology and Molecular Biology graduate from the Manchester Metropolitan University.  He has a passion for various different sports, scientific discovery and trainer brands.

Omarosa is not done with the White House

Common Sense Contributors
-
1

By Dolline Mukui.

Let’s talk about Omarosa.

A former assistant to the president and Director of Communications for the Office of Public Liaison for the White House. And if you haven’t heard, she is on Celebrity Big Brother US.

Having watched seasons past, it’s now become a recurring theme that being on a show like Big Brother will probably result in a lot of contestants baring their souls and revealing the real depths of their characters. But in the grand scheme of things, one never forgets that there is a game to be played, and there’s no winner without a good strategy. I’d like to think Omarosa’s was pretty straightforward.

When Omarosa resigned, or was fired (depending on who you ask), Big Brother grabbed the opportunity to have her on the show. Not only would it drive a mass audience to watch it, but due to it’s a secluded environment,  the house presents a great opportunity for the public to see truths and fabrications of individuals and compare them to what has been depicted and presented in various media publications.

So what have we learned about Omarosa and the White House since her recent appearance?

So far, she has been quiet expressive about her opinions. One of those instances occurred when she spoke to housemate Ross Mathews from E! Network. Ross asked if anyone questioned Trump’s tweets, and Omarosa replied ‘I tried to be that person and all of the people around him attacked me and said keep her away, don’t give her access…’. Going off the record of what has transpired within the first year of Trump’s presidency, we can’t fault Omarosa.

The White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah responded with, ‘Omarosa was fired three times on ‘The Apprentice,’ and this was the fourth time we let her go, she had limited contact with the President while here. She has no contact now.’

On another occasion, she spoke about the Vice President Pence and said that if he became president we would all be begging for Trump, because Pence is ‘extreme’.

From what we see in the big brother house, Omorosa is smart, intense and a force to be reckoned with. She clearly is not looking for sympathy; she wants people to understand that she was serving her country. And with many people misunderstanding her, she now has an opportunity speak her truth and try and adjust the skewed image of her which has been portrayed in the media.

 

Dolline is recently graduated with an MA in Broadcast Journalism. She is a ITV Breaking into News finalist whereby she reported on the Manchester Arena attack. Currently she is a voluntary co-host/contributor on show called a ‘Chat with Elle Celeste’. She also has a blog, where she talks about her life and travels.

Twitter: @ceraz_x

Is Netflix Racist or Mo’Nique Misguided?

Common Sense Contributors
-
3
Is Netflix Racist or Mo’Nique Misguided?

Two of our journalists give us their views on Mo’Nique. Join in on the debate over twitter. Who do you agree with? Emmabelle Nwadikwa or Busayo Twins

The Woman Who Cried Wolf

by Emmabelle Nwadikwa

Comedian and actor Mo’Nique seems to be on a mission to sabotage her own career. Mo’Nique has recently done a string of interviews discussing not only the issues that she claims have halted her career for the past few years, but she’s also been talking about her newest feud with Netflix.

Mo’Nique has claimed for years now that her refusal to promote “for free” a movie that she starred in led to her being blackballed by Oprah Winfrey, Lee Daniels and Tyler Perry. Now, Mo’Nique’s latest industry issue is the Netflix gender-based payment inequalities. Now, whilst equal pay is something I believe that we should all be campaigning for, Mo’Nique’s passive aggressive nature makes it hard to support her in anything she does.

Last year when these claims were addressed on The Real, Adrienne Houghton commented that keeping it real didn’t always have to mean being loud and she said that it could also involve keeping it classy and moving on. When fans tweeted Mo’Nique for her opinion she tweeted that Adrienne was a baby that couldn’t begin to understand, then went on to tweet Adrienne three more times since she chose not to respond.

This is the typical behaviour we’ve come to expect from Mo’Nique and it’s the same behaviour we’ve seen in the recent interviews she has done on The View and The Breakfast Club. When someone doesn’t agree with her, she’s automatically on the defensive no longer actually listens to what’s being said. It’s time for her to stop and consider the fact that the reason she isn’t paid as much is because, quite frankly, she isn’t that funny anymore.

For arguments sake, let’s say that Mo’Nique’s claims about being blackballed are true, surely another scandal will only make her career worse? Maybe Mo’Nique herself knows that the only way to make herself appear relevant is to cry wolf.

 

We hear you Mo’Nique, we are just indifferent                        

by Busayo Twins

You’d think at a time like this, when society claims to be committed to taking a hardline on any allegations of discrimination that Oscar winner, and comedian, Mo’Nique would automatically receive an infinite amount of support and solidarity. And despite racism and sexism being a poison that all people should detest it’s normally women and minority ethnic communities that take the more firm and immediate stance. Well, in the case of Mo’Nique it seems as though people are more concerned about proving how their emotions aren’t easily triggered into battle than the sentiments being shared. Truth is people don’t actually care about Mo’Nique enough support her recent pleas to boycott Netflix despite it being on the grounds of alleged racial and gender bias.

In January when she compared the stark difference of her £500,000 Comedy Special offer to that of fellow comedians Amy Schumer (£13 million), Chris Rock and Dave Chappelle (both £20 million) few flinched at this revelation. Where Mo’Nique may have attempted to use her misfortune to shed light on how a fairly obscure comedy industry also operates within prejudicial structures much of the attention was quickly redirected at her personality and character flaws. As of now, Netflix have not even provided an official explanation pertaining to the logic behind her offer, yet commentary online seems to be so sure that it’s rooted in fair reason.

Charlamagne tha God, ⅓ of the co- hosting trio of The Breakfast Club radio station, when interviewing Mo’Nique last week, admitted he suspected from a business point of view Schumer would be offered more money because her recent body of work was more impressive. Though appearing to make great business analysis his focus indicated that others like him do not understand how systemic discrimination can even impact a black woman’s portfolio. Let’s even put Mo’Nique’s situation aside for a second. To have a resume that competes with a white counterpart is often obstructed due to the lack of opportunity in the first place. Sexism platforms male talent whilst racism would disadvantage a black woman even further. Applying financial modelling to race and sex related scenarios is quite inappropriate as it will almost always serve to belittle the claims of the victimised. Money goes to where demand is yes but demand is conditioned by ideology. So the least that industries can do to mitigate against the perpetual cycle of discrimination is to keep an eye on the relative income of people within the same profession. If you listen to the full episode Mo’Nique and her husband articulate their thoughts well.

It becomes increasingly obvious that all the hoops people have been jumping through to discredit Mo’Nique simply stem from a personal indifference to her situation. Perhaps it’s a case of wrong person right message. But are we so prideful that we allow the former to muffle society’s need for a more progressive industry? Black people get few opportunities to grab the attention of the world in this way so how we handle this conversation should take priority. Yes, we are right to be diligent of her agenda but let us also be cautious not to conflate issues together and undermine our society objectives or the intersectionality theory altogether.

 

1...848586...92Page 85 of 92

Editor Picks

Must Read

Hot Topics

About Us

Our mission is to make democracy healthier by creating spaces for people who disagree to have fruitful dialogue.

Contact us: hello@tcsnetwork.co.uk

Follow Us

© Copyright - Newspaper theme by tagDiv