Home Blog Page 60

8/10 The Cost of Artistry | Amani Saeed

In a time where crime in our capital is at an all-time high, the narrative we often see in the mainstream media is that people of colour, are using violence to channel their pain.

This is only part of the story. There is a growing group of BAME men and women, using their experiences to inform their art. 

In our 10 part feature, we meet some of these artists. These artists are swimming against the tide, creating a lane for themselves.  They talk to us about the Cost of Artistry.

8/10 meet Amani Saeed

Amani Saeed for HuqThat

When did you discover you had a “talent”? 

When my mum told me so – kidding (kind of)! The first time I realised people liked my work was when I started performing at my local open mic. I was 19 and studying at Exeter, which is a predominantly white institution. It was the year Daesh had come to the forefront of the news with their beheading videos, and I was writing about what it meant to be a Muslim woman living in the wake of that cruelty. The poetry I wrote and performed resonated with the audience to the extent that I started getting booked for shows, doing radio interviews…it was exciting to me that people cared about the ideas I was expressing.

What have you had to sacrifice to nurture your talent? 

Sleep. When you’re working a 9-5 job, if you want to grow as an artist, you have to be deliberate about dedicating time to your craft. That means writing poems on the tube in the morning, doing admin during your lunch break, and using up your annual leave to go on Arvon retreats and do gigs. It means stumbling home at midnight from an open mic knowing you have to be up again in a few hours. None of this is glamorous, or even healthy, but at the moment, it’s what is necessary to keep me growing as an artist. 

I’ve also had to sacrifice my pride in order to grow. A friend gave me a great piece of advice – “if it scares you, you haveto do it.” This means taking calculated risks: performing pieces outside of my comfort zone, at events outside of my comfort zone. And sometimes that means bombing on stage. But you can’t grow from what you don’t learn from—so I fail gladly knowing that every failure is an opportunity to rise.

Who inspires your artistry?

The inspiration for my artistry comes from listening to rap, from artists like Kendrick, Missy, J. Cole, JID, Eve. From their music, I’ve learned the importance of flow, of rhythm, of pacing. Poetry is lyrical, whether it’s on the page or on the stage, so I always want my work to be technically sound. There’s a theatricality to rap that’s also made its way into my performance style. Rap teaches you confidence: to be bold and to trust your tongue.  It also teaches you how to throw your voice—how to slow it down, speed it up, harden it, soften it— so that it holds people’s attention. I find that the way you play your voice can take your audience on a journey as much as the narrative of your poem can. 

What is the biggest misconception people have about poets?

That we’re social justice warriors shouting into idealisms into an echo chamber. Poets are so aware and attuned to the environment they’re in. We’re constantly reacting, whether it’s in response to a news segment from across the Atlantic, or to something happening down the street. 

In an age where digital echo chambers are growing wider, what role do you think poetry can play in this? 

Poetry, especially when it’s performed, has the special power of being able to reach into a chest and touch a heart. It takes big, intellectual, sometimes alien concepts such as racism, sexism, and homophobia, and packages them into something a listener not only can understand, but can careabout. I would even go so far as to say poetry has the ability to bridge the divide between different communities. There is nothing as humbling or as empowering as listening to someone’s story.

Has a poem ever humbled or frightened you? What was it? When did it happen and what did you do afterwards?

Liam McCormick’s show ‘Beast’ scared the hell out of me. It was midnight and he was performing at the end of the Fringe to an audience of 4 people. He’d seen me performing a piece about sexual assault earlier in the evening, and when he was performing his poem about male violence, he didn’t break eye contact with me once. I’ve never felt so outraged or confronted by a poem before. It was frightening and humbling because after a really shouty section, his voice lowered and his eyes dimmed and he said “I am sorry”. It was the apology I never received from my abuser, and I’m grateful for it.

Some poets claim that a poem is like a living creature: once it’s out there is not much you can do to ‘correct’ or ‘improve’ it, while others edit meticulously, not leaving much from the original, draft form. What is your take on it?

To an extent, it depends on the form you’re using. When it comes to spoken word, I change my performance each time; you can’t perform a poem the same way twice because you’re not the same person at each performance. But when it comes to print, it’s like floating Moses out in a basket. That baby is out there and you can’t get it back. And to be honest, whether your poem is out on the page or on the stage, your intention is no longer relevant. You, the writer, had the opportunity to craft what you wanted to say. What becomes important is how the poem is heard and perceived and how it resonates with its audience – it is almost arrogant to impose your own intent on a poem after you publish it, because it is no longer yours. Poetry, like any public creative act, is deeply communal. The minute a poem leaves your hand or your mouth, it belongs to its audience.

How do you define success?

To me, success in poetry is about resonance. Did this poem touch someone’s heart? Did this poem influence someone’s mind? Did this poem make someone think differently about the world, did it comfort them, provoke them? If someone can shrug their shoulders and ask ‘so what?’ after hearing a poem, I consider that poem to have failed.

Amani’s collection SPLIT is available in all the major bookstores and via her publisher Burning Eye Books

Do you ever regret sharing your work publicly? Do you trust the reader in a world of instant gratification and instant communication?

No. I’ve published work and then decided in a few years later that I no longer agree with my thoughts, but this is a sign of growth, and not something to regret. I don’t know if it’s a question of ‘trusting’ the reader. People take what they need from poetry. All you can do is write from your heart and publish your work with hope and in good faith. The rest is kismet.

You can buy Amani’s poetry collection SPLIT here

Trump and the US-Mexico Border

Immigration is set to be hot topic for 2020 elections after Trump’s denial of reviving family separation at the border 

CLAREMONT, Calif. — Tuesday saw President Donald Trump putting an end to his administration’s policy of separating families at the border, and a shocking denial that he ever played a role in separating children. With claims that it was actually President Obama who separated children while in office, one has to wonder if Trump’s outright denial of his administration’s highly criticized handling of immigrants caught near the US-Mexico border has something to do with his stance on immigration in the 2020 election.

Donald Trump

“The President made it very clear this week, we’re not rethinking bringing back family separation,” said Mike Pence in an exclusive CNN interview this Thursday. His words seem contradictory to that of senior administration officials, who told CNN that the then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was being propelled by Trump to enforce a “zero-tolerance” immigration policy that was stricter and more widespread. Trump denied this on Tuesday, and Pence supported his public statements stating that Congress was responsible for providing a legislative solution for what he calls an inadequate immigration system.

There are speculations that President Trump’s management shakeup at the Department of Homeland Security is because he aims to make immigration a focal point in the 2020 election. His Tuesday denial of the highly documented involvement of the Trump administration in separating families at the US-Mexico border may also be part of pushing for a focus on immigration policy.

2018 saw the introduction of the Trump administration “zero-tolerance” policy which saw the prosecution of immigrant parents who crossed the border illegally, while their children were held separately at HHS. In a report released on Thursday by the inspector general for the Department of Health and Human Services, it was recorded that there was a spike in immigration family separations beginning in the summer of 2017. 

The separation of families at the US-Mexico border sparked public outcry with people condemning the Trump administration for what was considered an inhumane policy. December 2018 saw the death of 8-year old Guatemalan Felipe Gomez Alonzo in U.S. custody at a New Mexico hospital after “suffering a cough, vomiting and fever” reported, the Associated Press. Alonzo’s death alongside that of 7-year old Jakelin Caal are under investigation.

The administration identified 245 children who had been separated between late June 2018 and early February of this year said The New York Times. Four of those children are under additional review. June 20, 2018 saw Trump put an end of the “zero tolerance” policy with an executive order.

Despite great divisions on the nation’s stance on immigration, Trump unlike many democrats in the 2020 election has arguably provided solutions- namely the wall. Democrats have been said to lack a comprehensive immigration plan, according to Time Magazine. Former Secretary of Housing and Development, Julián Castro has published a detailed immigration proposal. Aside from Castro the Democrats seem to be leaving much to be desired when it comes to immigration policy.

“They’re gonna say they don’t want to separate families, that they don’t want to be as bad as Trump, because they want to be clear they’re not evil” said Jess Morales Rocketto to Time Magazine. Rocketto is the executive director of Care in Action, a part of the organizing team for the 2018 Families Belong Together marches. “But they don’t want to have a conversation about policy, because that will get into things that will alienate voters in Iowa and in South Carolina. By and large the overall feeling is that it is not helpful in gaining new votes.”

Perhaps this is the trick that President Trump has grasped onto, whereas many Democrats have not. Despite conflict in ideas about immigration policy Americans want to be provided with solutions and Trump is giving just that. He has potential 2020 supporters, with the number of Americans stating that immigration was the top problem facing the country increasing from 13% to 21% according to Gallup after mostly exaggerated reports of a migrant “caravan” making its way to the US. Three-quarters of GOP voters during the same period, highlighted illegal immigration as a major concern, compared to only 19% of Democratic-leaning voters. 

Democratic candidates have made proposals pertaining to immigration policy, some may argue that they lack depth or are limited in scope. Recently, Senator Kamala Harris introduced the American Dream Employment Act, which gives young people who qualify under DACA the opportunity to work in the Senate or House of Representatives. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand makes promises to “fix our broken immigration system,” giving no specifics of how she aims to do this on her campaign website. There have also been frequent calls from liberals to “Abolish ICE”, a goal which some democratic candidates have supported. 

“This is a good issue for the Republic base,” said GOP strategist David Winston. “This is a promise he made to them in 2016, which is why he’s coming back to it now.” This presents another issue, Trump’s recent denial of involvement in the separation of families at the US-Mexico border alongside the Department of Homeland Security shakeup sets the precedence for a reignited national conversation about immigration, a conversation that Democrats, according to Time Magazine, may not be prepared or equipped to have.

7/10 The Cost of Artistry | JJ Bola

In a time where crime in our capital is at an all-time high, the narrative we often see in the mainstream media is that people of colour, (particularly black men) are using violence to channel their pain.

This is only part of the story. There is a growing group of BAME men and women, using their experiences to inform their art. 

In our 10 part feature, we meet some of these artists. These artists are swimming against the tide, creating a lane for themselves.  They talk to us about the Cost of Artistry.

7/10 meet JJ Bola

When did you discover you had a “talent”? 

When I read a poem at my very first open mic and people gave me feedback. I’m not even sure if that meant I had “talent” but it was the first time anyone had ever read or heard my work and it felt very cathartic and affirming. I kept writing. However, since then, I see talent less and less as something I have, and focus more on what I consider to be crucial, which is endless persistent and stick-to-it-ness. 

What have you had to sacrifice to nurture your talent? 

My time. Although I’m doing what I love, reading and writing, there are also a number of other things that I would love to have tried to dedicate myself to that I know I would not be able to. For instance, I’d love to learn to play the piano so that I could play one of my favourite songs. Perhaps in the future.

Who inspires your artistry?

I’m largely inspired by my life experiences and what is going in the world. I take things that I know or have seen and fly away with it in my imagination. 

What is the biggest misconception people have about poets?

That poets are sad, lonely and boring and only concern themselves with the serious matters of existence. Whilst those may be valid, to a degree, at least for me, it is not absolute. I love a good party. I am adventurous and do things many would not expect me to. 

In an age where digital echo chambers are growing wider, what role do you think poetry can play in this? 

Poetry can teach people how to feel; how to be human again. It can bring us back to ourselves, and listen to each other, rather than just being stuck in the same space shouting. 

JJ’s Tedx talk

Has a poem ever humbled or frightened you? What was it? When did it happen and what did you do afterwards?

Not really humbled or frightened, but some moments have made me cry. I cried whilst listening to David J Pugilist’s poetry performance about police brutality. I cried listening to Anis Mojgani. 

Some poets claim that a poem is like a living creature: once it’s out there is not much you can do to ‘correct’ or ‘improve’ it, while others edit meticulously, not leaving much from the original, draft form. What is your take on it?

I don’t know. It’s neither here nor there for me, a poem is it’s own thing; poets are the vehicles through which it arrives. And it comes and goes and comes and goes and comes and goes, and perhaps, for a moment, we are lucky to read/hear the poem, luckier still to even write it in the first place. 

How do you define success?

The ability to survive the madness that is this existence and the absurdity that is life itself; everyday above ground is a success, and even days beneath it too. 

Do you ever regret sharing your work publicly? Do you trust the reader in a world of instant gratification and instant communication?

No regrets. There is no trust other than the trust that my art, my writing, will find who it needs to find and at the right time they need to find it in.  

You can buy JJ’s novel No Place to Call Home and his poetry collection Refuge in all book stores, or directly through his publisher, OWN IT!, here: https://ownit.london/shop/

Zion Williamson: The Second Coming of Lebron James?

By Rutvik Perepa

This year’s NCAA Basketball saw one of the most explosive collegiate stars since the likes of Anthony Davis and Blake Griffin. We take a look at the projected number one pick in the 2019 NBA Draft, Zion Williamson, and discuss whether he really will live up to the hype.

Zion was visibly upset, but gave Michigan the credit they deserved in the post-game interview. Williamson then gave a short reflection on the year, summarising that the team culture and the family atmosphere played a big part in the very successful Duke team. He once again showed out with a game-high 24 points and 14 rebounds and said there’s a “high possibility” he has played his final game with the Blue Devils. “Everybody that beats Duke is ready to put that on the wall because that’s the program that (Krzyzewski has) built,” Michigan State coach Tom Izzo said. “I do think we beat arguably the best team in the country, but there’s another game coming up.”

The hype behind Zion Williamson

Zion Williamson was very hyped coming into college from high school owing to his outrageous dunks on YouTube. He has all the highlight reels, but experts doubted his skills until he exploded onto the college basketball scene playing with the Duke Blue Devils under Coach Mike Krzyzewski, who also coaches Team USA Basketball.

Zion, who stands at 6ft7 and 285 lbs is projected to be the number one pick in the 2019 NBA Draft, as agreed by virtually all basketball analysts. He plays both the small forward and power forward position, and with his dominant size and athleticism, Zion has the ability to explode to the rim with an unstoppable force.

In addition to his physical dominance, Zion has excellent passing ability and can even be counted on to play the point guard position. In the ACC Championship game, Williamson led the team with 21 points on 7-11 shooting in a 73–63 win over 12th-ranked Florida. He joined Kevin Durant as the only freshmen in the last 20 years to average at least 25 or more points and 10 rebounds per game during a conference tournament.

Rebounding, passing, scoring, defensive energy and general tenacity with that ‘Competitor Gene’, are Zion’s highest upsides coming into the NBA, especially his defense and obvious skill in creating opportunities to score. He lacks in shooting glaringly but then again, so did superstars like LeBron James coming into the league, it’s a skill that can be worked on.

What is also a questionable transition, is utilizing the 285 lbs of mass to score as effectively and effortlessly as he did in college, but he does make up for that in the initial stages with his willingness to pass the ball.

The race to sign Zion

Zion Williamson is again the most hyped prospect since perhaps Anthony Davis in 2012 and LeBron James in 2003. He is also without question extremely marketable to the point where some analysts have suggested the idea of him possibly receiving a billion dollar lifetime sneaker deal. He will realistically be one of, or even the highest payed rookie in history in terms of a sneaker deal.

Social media has of course drastically fast tracked Zion’s basketball fame and as a result increased his market value. However, no one can question his likability, being described as a massive personality in the locker room and an all-around nice guy on his college campus. It’s clear Zion has a charisma that people are drawn to, and this will work wonders in his business career as well as his basketball one.

The Nike PG13 explosion issue in a game against arch-rivals, North Carolina Tar Heels, saw Zion big up a knee injury that sent the media into frenzy. Nike main competitors, Adidas, Under Armour, would be pleased to say the least, but the possibility of Zion striking an even larger sum with Nike that includes compensation, is certainly on the table now.

Zion Nike shoe explodes during a game. Source: USA Today

Since Duke crashed out of the NCAA tournament, how Zion Williamson will fare in the NBA has been the discussion in sports studios across America. In collegiate basketball, Zion is truly a man amongst boys, however at NBA level there are countless players with his physical ability and athleticism.

So the question now is: does he have the skill and composure to perform on the new and greater stage that is the NBA. Whatever the case, Zion Williamson will bring a lot of attention to whichever team pairs off with him in the draft. The NBA awaits Zion Williamson with all anticipation and excitement at the prospect that he could be a phenom with the X factor of a Lebron James. At this point however, only time will tell.

Do you think Zion will live up to the hype in the NBA? Check out our live poll on Twitter and let us know what you think!

FA Cup: Manchester City and Watford Make it to The Final

Saturday saw Manchester City edge past Brighton 1-0 in the first Semi-final, before Watford’s scintillating 3-2 comeback victory over Wolves on Sunday. Both teams will now return to Wembley for the FA Cup final on 18th May.

And so, it has all come down to this; Manchester City vs Watford. The oldest cup competition in the world, a process which has involved over 700 teams and started all the way back in July 2018 is now just a game away from being decided for another year. It is a match up that few would have predicted, with Watford’s only ever previous appearance in the final coming way back in 1984. Javi Gracia’s side were not even expected to make it this year, with Wolves pinned as favourites in their Semi-final clash. Manchester City meanwhile, always seemed likely to be at Wembley come May, but will know that many expect them to already have one hand on this trophy.

Pep ‘Quadriola’?

Make no mistake, City were not at their best against Brighton on Saturday afternoon. Yes, they scored a great early goal thanks to a sumptuous pass from Kevin De Bruyne, but Brighton gave a good account of themselves and it was hardly an open and shut case for City. In fact, the Seagulls really should have scored when some last ditch defending from Aymeric Laporte meant that Glenn Murray was somehow unable to turn Shane Duffy’s header into the net.

Yet despite this, City made it over the line, meaning they are still chasing the unprecedented ‘quadruple’ of the League Cup, FA Cup, Premier League and Champions League. A feat that no English team has ever achieved, and no European side since Celtic in 1967. Pep Guardiola has already made clear that he believes winning the quadruple is “almost impossible” and reiterated that fatigue will play a big part in whatever happens next.

This picture will become a little more clear after their midweek Champions League Quarter-final first-leg against Tottenham on Tuesday. City will go into the game knowing that having already secured the League Cup, a place in the FA Cup final and the current title of favourites to win the Premier League they are already well-placed to win some form of treble. If they failed to win the Champions League however, I suspect their Manchester neighbours would have something to say about the level of prestige in this ‘treble’ when compared with their own from 1999. The FA Cup depends on how City perform on the day; the quadruple will be decided over the next month.

Wolves miss out
Wolves fans at Wembley
Source: Shropshire Live

How did they let this slip? Leading 2-0 at Wembley until the 79th minute, most teams would have felt comfortable that they had made it to the final. A combination of nervous defending, a huge shift in momentum and a simply delightful goal from Gerard Deulofeu meant that this was not to be the case for Wolves on Saturday. Watford turned the game around in 15 minutes, with Troy Deeney levelling things up from the spot in the 94th. Then in Extra Time, Deulofeu the substitute, scored a second on the break to bring Watford back to Wembley.

It is a disappointing end to a great season for Wolves, in which they have seemingly become every neutral’s favourite team. This was a chance to cap their great progress and performances with some silverware and a first FA Cup final since 1960. Instead they will be left to focus on the league and remaining the ‘best of rest’ by attempting to secure 7th place. Of course, this would still be a remarkable achievement that could bring European football to Molineux, but Sunday’s result must have been tough to take. For those Wolves-loving neutrals, it’s a shame not to see the enigmatic Nuno Espirito Santo win his first major trophy as manager. Questions must be asked of Nuno after some of his tactical substitutions and the manner of this loss however, but he was honest in his assessment saying:


“We had it and it got away from us”

Source: BBC Sport
Gracia the great
Gracia embraces Doucoure after the final whistle
Source: EPA/The Independent

Although Nuno has received near-consistent praise throughout this season, his opposite number on Sunday, Javi Gracia has been greatly under-appreciated since his appointment. Whilst Nuno is the classically flamboyant, charismatic and energetic presence so often feted by the media, Gracia is more measured and quiet in his approach. This invariably led to criticism last season that he was boring, uninspiring or even ‘effective rather than thrilling’.

Looking at Watford’s results under Gracia last season and just a 26.7% win ratio, perhaps criticism was fair, but his assumed persona definitely played its part in this. Watford were already in decline after the departure of Marco Silva and Gracia had not yet been given the opportunity to make this team his own. Fast-forward a year and you’d be hard pressed to find many fans being critical of his performance this season. Well-placed for a top 10 Premier League finish and even a European place, and now into the FA Cup final. For a club the size of Watford you simply can’t ask for much more than that and he is surely a leading contender for manager of the season. Win the FA Cup and all bets could be off.

When I Get Home, An Enigmatic Exploration Of Solange’s Journey To Herself

Two years after the release of A Seat At The Table, Solange dropped When I Get Home. After the widespread critical acclaim and success of her classic album, to say there was high expectations for the follow up would be an understatement. A Seat At The Table explored the lived black experience, exploring themes of prejudice and the intersections of black existence, including ‘F.U.B.U’ and ‘Don’t Touch My Hair’. The album was interlaced with thought provoking interludes featuring her parents, Master P and friends, discussing their own encounters navigating racism. A Seat At The Table allowed for Solange to find her musical home in between genres of psychedelic funk and modern soul, as well as redirecting the narrative from simply “Beyonce’s sister” to “Artist”: “I think any time you truly feel seen, you just feel a certain level of joy”.

When I Get Home however, contrasted heavily against this. It was deeply enigmatic, for both the listener and seemingly, Solange. When I Get Home is a delicate exploration of Solange’s navigation of identity. It is fragmented, experimental and though it may not carry the same replay value that its predecessor did, it is still a deeply personal gaze into Solange as an artist.

A Seat At The Table is as a political album – crafted for her audience. When I Get Home takes us back to Solange’s figurative ‘home’ – within herself. Therefore, it’s understandable why it has provoked such a mixed reaction. Many reviews note on the artistry as being lazy, particularly the repetition on the album. Saw Things I Imagined repeats ‘Saw things I imaged’ 16 times, a song which has also been turned into a meme. In an interview with Clash, Solange explains this exploration of mundane/repetitive lyricism: “Repetition is a really strong way to reinforce these mantras… the first four times I didn’t actually believe it but by the eighth time it’s coming into my body and my spirit”.h

The album also features a 33-minute film released on Apple music, which was directed and edited by Solange. Self described as “Texas Film”, explores a literal journey to Third Ward – her home in Houston, Texas.  Many of the art and sculptures features in the film are also designed by Solange.

When I Get Home is an example of what true artistry should be: personal and crafted with unadulterated, unfiltered freedom. Solange doesn’t conform to music industry expectations; this album isn’t for the consumer, it’s for the artist.

As Solange says in her Clash interview:

“[When I Get Home] feels like a true reflection of who I am, the things I love to listen to, the things that I love to experience… [it is] a snapshot of myself at this present time”.

Should The UK Implement a Paid Period Leave Into Work Policies?

Most women can vividly remember days where we’d be hunched over in pain waiting for the cramps to stop. Unfortunately, despite the feeling of a hundred arrows piercing through our abdomens, the dull and constant ache in our backs and legs that would accompany the stitches and the strong feeling of nausea that would eventually wash through our bodies, we still had to continue with work, classes and our ordinary daily routines. Its not that the agony was not excruciating enough, but because there is nothing in place for us to not be in attendance. We HAVE to work, we HAVE to go to classes, because we knew that what we were going through would not be a viable excuse for us to take any time off.

Periods. Yes, I said it. PERIODS. A stigma has been attached to what is natural for 50% of the world’s population for far too long. Some of us go through simple and short menstrual cycles whereas others dread the days coming up to what seems like a period of pain. Until recently, at least in the western world, women in the workplace would be reduced to being in pain and not be able to escape it. We’ve been stuck inside the confines of the work environment or would have to take off on sick days.

However, slowly and surely we have been witnessing a gradual change which has been set out to make being a women slightly easier. Paid. Period. Leave. 

On 25thMarch 2017 Italy’s parliament considered implementing a law that would put into effect companies allowing females days off if they suffer painful periods as “Menstrual leave”. Last year they followed through with this idea and now Italy is the first country in Europe who’s policy requires employers to offer a paid period leave for a couple days to women. Albeit, they are far from being the first. This policy has already existed in Japan since 1947, in some provinces in China, Korea and Indonesia. Currently, Nike, a sportswear giant company is the only known international company to implement this kind of leave into their code of conduct worldwide. And a bit more closer to home, the UK establishment Coexist (Bristol based) a community interest company, is the first and only known establishment to introduce menstrual leave since 2016. Some require doctors’ notes whereas others are automatically given leave if they choose to take it.

Nike Logo

But why hadn’t we heard about in before in the news? Why don’t, despite being offered the break, many women in China take up the opportunity to rest? Is this a breakthrough policy, is it time for all women to rejoice or does it risk causing the gap between men and women in the working world to increase tenfold?

Most importantly, should the UK implement a paid period leave into work policies? It is a question which has recently been disputed in discussion groups across the country.

Improvement Of Productivity 

Women not being in pain at work may be beneficial to the workplace in terms of productivity, despite the lack of attendance. This is due to the fact that while in discomfort, in general, work tends to become a harder task and therefore may take longer and just like working while sick, efficiency of work is put at risk. 

Time outside of the workplace doesn’t necessarily mean that less work will be done. Being able to work from home (which may or may not be considered as a complete “leave” – bear with me) may encourage a more relaxed environment and more efficient work will be carried out. If that alternative isn’t possible, similar to some establishments that have put the period policy into play, work can be redistributed and reorganised in a way that the time at work can be used more efficiently and the same amount of work can be produced. It is all up to the workplace to make this a possibility.

Equity Over Equality

A policy like this one respects that women are different to men and so require a slightly different type of code especially when concerning women’s bodies, the integral part which makes men and women different. This policy, instead of punishing women for their natural bodily processes shows that they are not only valued in their places of work but are also equal to men, in that the law is being crafted to suit both sexes.

As someone who personally suffers from dysmenorrhea (also known as extremely painful periods). I would triumph if I knew I was entitled to spend some of these agonising hours at home. On the other hand, I cannot deny the fact that I, amongst many other people, can foresee the issues that it may cause.

Employers Reluctance To Hire Women 

It is a known fact that before the days of protection of women in the workplace, ladies could easily be turned down by an employer due to many reasons but most likely the excuse that the ‘likelihood’ of a women becoming pregnant could interrupt and cause delays at work which, in turn, would cost them money. Since then, this kind of sexism is forbidden (although of course still practised in some places) and policies such as 90% paid maternity leave (and paternity leave, no men weren’t forgotten about) for six months in the UK (and further if required at a smaller pay) have been implemented.

However, it must be acknowledged that while it is illegal, this could be used as an excuse for employers to not employ women as they could end up working less days and in turn working less but still costing the employers the same. This punishes women for being women.

Reinforces Stereotypes

Most, if not all women have been or heard another being undermined by male counterparts on the subject of menstrual cycles. Are you on your period? Is it your time of month? Comments like this are sort to render women as a feeble sex, controlled by PMS induced emotions and weaker because of them. The workplace greatly mimics a school-ground environment and for that reason words spread like wild fires across the offices and desks right up to the chit chats by the coffee machine in the kitchen area. Of course we should not be swayed by other people’s opinions and judgements but we must remember that men are much more prevalent in the workplace, especially in corporate environments. Are we ready to fight against judgement in the workplace, in a place where we are trying to decrease gaps between sexes?

In China, as earlier discussed, the leave exists in some places however many women do not take up on that offer due to feeling as they themselves would cause disruptions at work. Further across the world periods still persists on the taboo side of conversation and discussing such issues with an employer may feel daunting. 

Chinese women working in a factory

All in all, I am completely for paid period leave, a leave that I believe will not only help women who dread going into work whilst suffering in pain but also work establishment that will know that they work towards creating a healthy work environment which takes individual differences into consideration.

In addition, on a sly note, we all are aware that if men felt even a ounce of what (some) women had to go through during their monthly cycle, paid period leave would have been woven into the system decades ago.

In a world where we are battling for equity in the working world, can women afford to have something which undermines their ability to work as well as men? If we don’t, doesn’t it say something about the way the working world works for men and not women if policies aren’t implemented for women. Men and women are different and so cannot be subject to the same exact laws! Whether or not this leave becomes a reality in the UK and possibly other parts of the world is up to us and the conversation is very necessary. 

Should we incorporate a paid period leave? join in on our twitter poll below.


Resistance Is Real And If We Let It, It Will Take Over Everything

Viktor Frankel once said, “Those who have a ‘why’ to live, can bear with almost any ‘how’.”

We all represent a cause, no matter how deeply buried it may be. Through introspection, we can find and define it. Once defined, the ‘why’ can bubble to the surface like hot lava. When ‘why’ becomes collectively defined, you have an eruption and movements rise from the earth. Beauty can also emerge as destruction, a volcano can give rise to island paradise in an empty sea, or reveal devastation burying a civilisation in ash.

Inner alignment of the soul and a life of action upon it moves mountains – even if just being for ourselves, it will have been worth it – a conduit to finding our meaningfulness in a world devoid of it.

Creating Movements

The world is a divided place, there’s neither two ways about it. Existing behavioural patterns and social customs are thick set in the grey muzzle of societies. It takes showing clear value to the naysayers for a tipping point of acceptance to be breached, before any self-sustaining momentum can reach mass approval for a movement.

Elizabeth Gilbert conceptualised creativity saying inspiration is a force distinct from us that we can’t rely upon showing up for us. What we can do is show it we are worth showing up for by diligently showing up and doing the work we do every day. Understanding that our creative ideas and innovations we put out into the world came through us, but not necessarily from us, is an exquisitely liberating notion.

One hopes as a writer that their musings stimulate thought, and that thoughts can become discussions which blossom into debates. These discourses can then bridge divides between camps that see the world as black and white contrasting poles. To move us beyond this world that bends our perspectives, helping us see straighter.

The most significant aspect for a writer is whether they achieve any of the above. This holds for artists across the board, be they entrepreneur or musician. Whatever the ambition or momentum, they want to influence the world in some meaningful fashion. The trouble is, that creativity and drive, without introspection and vision, leaves us taking shots in the dark. Purpose isn’t the answer, it’s intent.

You may well know starting a project with grand designs on changing the world. They may tell you they’re building a movement. The frequency which this word gets thrashed about, you’d be forgiven everyone was starting a movement. Whether your nan’s knitting brigade, to the new vegan infusions café-cum-library in town, or the micro-brewery started in your neighbour’s garage, and the funk-soul-reggae band ranting and raving over the legalisation of cannabis, at long last. But these are not truly movements because they rarely take off. Without that firmly established destination or cause, they lack the purpose to transcend ‘fad’ status.

They may make the latest, albeit transient, fashion statement. They could be a brand with a following. But a movement is what happens when the curtain comes down. What comes after? Do they accept your mailing list requests, like posts and share amusing content? Or do they pull themselves up by the braces on their three-quarter length jeans and step up to the mantle as volunteers?

The difference is as much motivation as it is communication. Let’s be under no pretences. Mindset is everything – changing your own is hard, influencing others is harder yet. Why expect them to stick around if you don’t have a coherent idea of the change you want to make? A cause is fundamentally detached from any old brand. Brands are seen, manipulated and cultivated to create the appearance of being noticed for how they wish to present themselves to the world. There’s not much legroom in the opacity of pretence. You can try to reinvent yourself, sure, but most will see through the façade. Causes, however, are built on emotion – driven by feeling. There’s something innately raw and genuine when gut feeling, heart, and passion collide. What they want to do and be because of you inspire in them.

Many movements are not generally rooted in one streamlined process of thought, but separate entities with lives of their own – they may stand distinct, but they are rooted in similar cause and intent.

It may be standing up for the rights of oppressed minorities; a maligned individual igniting debates on the rule of law, crime and punishment, such as the fierce discussions and suits surrounding capital punishment; admiration for disciplined crafts or skills, such as new glass blowing or cocktail making. It could be standing resolute for the arts in a world driven by science. The common theme between all of these is in the doing, rather than specifically in what I am creating. In establishing a following, it’s not about where one leads you, but about where you lead yourself. It’s “do as they do”, as opposed to the coercive “do as I say.” This leaves the culture of a movement malleable and its cause intentional. Why is it that nobody likes it when vegans raid factories and plaster it all over social media as “meat is murder”? Or, take animal cruelty activists breaking up a fox and hound hunt in the Home Counties. The problem with these actions is they alter what we see, not how we feel. Constant announcements detract from the desire to leave the world a better place. Causes are built and pursued, but it is on the rest to choose whether they follow.

This is easily overlooked. Not least because of a globalised, background static makes it appear raising awareness comes from talking. To simply put a like, comment or share and think “well then, that’s my job done. Little slice of goodness for the day. Give yourself a pat on the back”, does little to pressure organisations, drum up meaningful volunteers, activists or following. It bores down to actively doing things worth talking about.

This is easier said than done. We all procrastinate in our own fashions. The danger is when it compounds. The author Steven Pressfield calls procrastination “resistance” in his book The War of Art. He refers to it as the main antagonist between you and the great work you are meant to achieve, a force of nature. The way universal entropy expresses itself in human life.

Resistance is real and if we let it, it will take over everything. In one way or another we are all working to defeat resistance in some area of our life.

Whether just getting started on the immediate, most important task in hand, through to the long-term slog – we are all human, all susceptible to the same weaknesses and quirks. Albeit in modulating levels of excusing and concealing them.

Let alone those leaders in their solitary ventures, holing fast day-in, day-out. The ebb and flow of criticism, waning loyalties, fickle followers and the often-thankless efforts fighting against them.

It Really Is Lonely At The Top

Take Martin Luther King and his movement for civil rights, fighting thick and thin through the slurry of oppressive structures and a society unwilling to admit its failings. Jackie Chan’s intent in nearly breaking every bone in his body emanated his resilience, motivation and boundless energy, turning a “useless” stuntman into reinventing the Bruce Lee era of martial arts with comedic Kung Fu. Take J.K. Rowling going through twelve publishers just to find one that would publish The Philosopher’s Stone, after having gone through severe depression as a broke, divorced and single mother to the point of contemplating suicide after her mum died. She was in a very dark place indeed. Her only refuge was in this world of wizarding and make-believe, so she dragged her daughter around cafes to tire her out so she could write and share with the world. She’s since become one of England’s largest philanthropists since establishing the Volant Charitable Trust to alleviate social inequality in 2000 with the words “I think you have a moral responsibility when you’ve been given far more than you need, to do wise things with it and give intelligently.” Even if the first Harry Potter book failed, she would have continued writing and fighting to publish the rest anyway. It must be terrifying to accept life is outside our control yet fight for it tooth and nail regardless.

“To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order;
to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order;
to put the family in order; we must first cultivate our personal life;
we must first set our hearts right.” – Confucius

For many of us, we may not reach such heights. But this doesn’t matter. What does is choosing our cause and acting on it with intent. From changing our mentality and providing for family and friends, this is a noble act on our little corner of the world. It’s often the getting started that is the hardest. But once you find yourself doing, rather than waxing lyrical on some problem or issue in your life or the world that gets your back up, plant your feet and hold your ground. Others may stand with you, some may fall by the wayside. And when you eventually bring yourself to reflect, you’ll see the positive impact you have paved for in the world. As Confucius once conceptualised what it would take for a harmonious society, he sought to define a rigid social structure that would promote social order, moral behaviour and filial piety. A protocol specialist of the highest order, wherein everyone knows who they are, their position and can relate to everyone else. It follows in his Analects of Confucius [475-221 BC] (quote above)

Beyond Brexit: What Next for Britain?

On Friday 29th March 2019, the day the UK was scheduled to set sail on the horizon of it’s new autonomous life outside of the European Union, we embarrassingly find ourselves still in the midst of a fierce and confusing Brexit deal tussle.

On the same Friday in Manchester, The Common Sense Network hosted Beyond Brexit; an event which aimed to make sense of the Brexit debate, exploring the history of Britain’s position in the European Union and discussing the different views that shaped our first Brexit Referendum some two and a half years ago. All with the outlook of equipping millennials in understanding where the UK might stand beyond Brexit, if we ever get there that is.

The event featured guests and panellists ranging from MEPs, YouTuber’s, journalists, MPs and writers, all coming together to tackle the fast becoming enigma that is Brexit.

Starting With The Basics

The mornings events were kicked off with a workshop going Inside Brexit: examining the inner workings of Europe and it’s institutions. This was led by TCS Network’s own, Afshan D’souza (Editor-in-chief of The Common Sense Network) and Mike Omoniyi (CEO of The Common Sense Network).

Afshan opened the session by highlighting the power of the mainstream media in controlling the Brexit narrative, particularly national tabloids like The Sun and The Daily Mirror who have been instrumental in fuelling the Leave campaign.

She emphasised the importance of TCS Network in presenting both sides of the argument as opposed to consistently pushing a singular opinion which can manipulates the public viewpoint.

Finding Commonality

Later in the afternoon, Member of European Parliament for North West England, Wajid Khan, sat down with Mike to share his thoughts on the Brexit debate so far and what politicians need to do to resolve growing fallacies around the UK’s identity as a member of the European Union.

Wajid said, “We need to bring young people, professionals, youth groups, and community organisations together – like the work you do at The Common Sense Network – to make sure we get a variety of divergent views and find some commonality.”

Wajid Khan was passionate in his view that news outlets need to do more to help the public have a better grip on an ever changing Brexit story. You can check out his full interview with TCS Network, below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWTQfra7XKU&feature=youtu.be

What Next?

The day’s events culminated with a panel discussion on the UK Beyond Brexit including YouTubers, Jazza John and Mr200m, Labour MP, Afzal Khan and TCS Network editor-in-chief, Afshan D’souza-Lodhi.

The discussion was highly interactive with the audience engaged throughout. An interesting point raised by one audience member during questions was the role Brexit has played in exacerbating Islamophobia in the UK.

The panellists were also keen to get involved and share their views; Afzal Khan giving special insight from within the House of Commons, highlighted the importance of considering that whether or not Britain remains in the UK, changes to our relationship with the EU will be inevitable.

With predominantly Remainers in the audience and on the panel, Mike Omoniyi, who led the discussions, encouraged both panellists and audience members to consider the view point of members of the British public in the Leave camp. This is consistent with the work TCS Network does, bringing people together to talk to each other rather than about each other from separate echo chambers.

Britain having failed to leave the EU on 29th March left little certainty regarding life beyond Brexit. As as result, this raised the question in the final half of the discussions of what should happen now. Second referendums, second general elections and even revoking Article 50 were all discussed, with a live Twitter poll that saw TCS Network followers vote in favour of a second referendum!

Overall, the event was highly informative and engaging. And in an exhausting time in British politics, this was an event that brought different voices together to make sense of Brexit and also anticipate how the UK would fair beyond the EU.

Premier League Round-Up: Matchday 32-33

0

The Premier League is back after what felt like a long international break and with all the top 6 teams playing over the weekend and midweek and with fine margins for error the results sure didn’t disappoint.

Liverpool hold on to see out Spurs

A game of nerves and all to play for with a win for either team allowing one to go back to the top of the League and the other to add more to their tally to secure the Champions League spot.

With a goal from Firmino in the 16th minute in the form of a header from a whipping Robertson’s cross, it looked like Liverpool were going to get away with the game.

This really was a game of luck as Allison made a near fatal error that could have levelled the game for Spurs, but a Spurs goal did come later from a Moura finish in the six yard box on the 70th minute.

What looked to be a draw took a dramatic turn from an Toby Alderweireld own goal that came from a Mo Salah header at the net in the 90th minute to see Liverpool take all three points and go two points clear with one more game played than Manchester City.

Salah celebrating Liverpools emphatic win against Tottenham to stay top
Source: Standard

Hugo Lloris was a major cause for the own goal with his monuments blunder, fans and pundits alike lambasting his numerous mistakes over the season and his Spurs career. Klopp was delighted and called it an ugly win. It seems fate might be willing Liverpool to win their first ever Premier League. With this loss Spurs now sit 4th.

Solskjaer starts with double against in form Watford and Wolves

With Ole Gunnar Solskjær now being the permanent manager with a new three year contract, it was important to start off with a win and Rashford and Martial provided that.

Manchester United were on the verge of having three losses in a row, with already being knocked out of the FA Cup by Wolves. It was time for Solskjær and the team to kick themselves into gear. It took just under half an hour for the first goal of the game from a quick counter-attack from Luke Shaw with a through ball to Rashford who calmly finished over Foster.

Martial added the second of the game in the second half after a scrappy entangle with Foster to hit it in the back of the net which looked to be slightly offside but the goal still stood. Hopefully this will be a new starting point for Martial to perform to the ability he was bought for and be the player everyone perceives him to be. Manchester United hit difficult patches against Watford, not being able to elevate their game seems to be a lingering problem for Solskjaer’s men.

United traveled to West Midlands on Tuesday night to play a Wolves team who have already dispatched of them once this season. Unlike their Watford game however, United paid the price for a lackluster display, in a game that saw Mike Dean give his 100th Premier League red card – the only referee in Premier League history to reach this feat.

Man United left stunned by Wolves.
Source: Independent

United took the lead early on through McTominay, but Wolves equalised under ten minutes after. In a game that could have ended as a draw, Wolves secured the well deserved three points through a Chris Smalling own goal on the 77th minute. Manchester United now sit sixth place in the league, two points off top four contention.

Manchester City fight to regain top spot

Manchester City wasted no time against Fulham over the weekend, with a quick goal from Bernardo Silva inside five minutes. Driving the ball low into the left hand side of the goal means Silva has now scored 3 goals in his last 3 matches.

Aguero 27th minute goal brings to as many goals for Man City as Thierry Henry scored for Arsenal (228). The loss against Man City was the penultimate game before Fulham’s loss to Watford on Tuesday that officially deemed them relegated from the Premier League.

Man City hosted an indignant Cardiff City side on Wednesday, playing their game which would take them top of the league with a win. Pep’s men comfortably dispatched of the Bluebirds, winning 2-0 in a game that saw goals from Kevin DeBruyne and Leroy Sane.

Man City put on a good team performance against struggling Cardiff.
Source: ITV

Chelsea win comfortably against Brighton

After a last ditch win against Cardiff City at the weekend, Maurizio Sarri was hoping for a more convincing win against relegation fighters, Brighton. Chelsea rising star, Callum Hudson-Odoi, was handed his first Premier League start, showing his quality by providing the assist for Chelsea’s first half goal, converted by Olivier Giroud.

Chelsea continued to pile on the pressure into the second half, and were rewarded with two goals from Eden Hazard and Ruben Loftus-Cheek only three minutes apart (60, 63). After seeing off Brighton, Chelsea maintained their bid to earn a top four slot. They’re now on equal points with fifth place Arsenal, who still have a game in hand.

Arsenal seek to make it 10 consecutive home wins

Arsenal looked very dominant in their game against Newcastle, having a large majority of the possession. Aaron Ramsey initially having his first volley ruled offside scored minutes later with a low sweeping shot to the right-hand corner at the 30-minute mark to cap off the first half.

Arsenal were in cruise control for the majority of the game with Newcastle constantly being on the back foot. Having more shots on target than Newcastle had shots all together showed Arsenal’s dominance in the game.

Lacazette sealed the game for the Gunners at the 83rd minute. Arsenal now move into the top four. It should be noted that Arsenal were 10 points behind Tottenham at the start of February. For Emery it has been a bit of a rollercoaster ride but fans must be slowly and surely backing his leadership.

With only 6-7 games left, this Premier League campaign truly is a nail biter. Liverpool and City are neck and neck for the title, while the top four fight is as close as it’s ever been!

Keep up to date with TCS for more sports news and Premier League action.

Nipsey Hussle: An Icon To The South L.A. Community

Both the Hip Hop world and South LA community have been left in mourning following reports of the untimely passing of LA rapper, Nipsey Hussle. Nipsey Hussle, real name – Ermias Asghedom, was tragically gunned down outside of his LA shop, Marathon Clothing store.

With a savvy nature that has often been compared to that of music mogul Jay Z, Asghedom exuberated business excellence.

‘My thing is that I don’t give no person that much power over my path that I’m walking. Not one person can make or break what I’m doing, except me or God’

– Nipsey Hussle

Recognising the need for black artists to assert their independence and strive for economic stability, Asghedom went the independent route to distribute his music. In 2013 Asghedom announced that he would be independently selling his mixtape ‘Crenshaw’ for $100 each, which attracted criticism from both his peers and fans. Using 24-hour pop up stores to sell his mixtape, Asghedom not only managed to make $100,00 (Jay Z bought 100 copies), that day but had now created a template that other upcoming independent artists would soon follow.

Five years later Asghedom would release the Grammy nominated album ‘Victory Lap’ to critical acclaim. The Album gave insight to his journey from ‘flourishing from the streets to black businesses’.

Asghedom’s local Crenshaw neighbourhood also made an appearance in on the album. A constant theme in Asghedom’s music is his love for his local community, the mixtapes Crenshaw and Mailbox Money, latter famously sold for $1,000 respectively, both contain odes to his hometown.

‘He gave opportunities to those largely ignored by American society’

Affectionately known as ‘Neighborhood Nip’ in his native South L.A community, Asghedom aspired to transform his hometown and give opportunities to those largely ignored by American society. Unlike many of his peers who once hitting it big, abandon their hometown, a large part of Asghedom’s entrepreneurial pursuits were in his local community. In Hyde Park, he owned a burger joint, fish market and helped fund upgrades to campus playgrounds.

The Crenshaw District was home to some of his biggest business ventures such as his clothing store plaza and local learning centers for kids.

‘Role model for both the local kids and the young black men in the community’

A former gang member himself, Asghedom was due to meet with LAPD official Michel and Police Commissioner Steve Soboroff to discuss measure being placed to curb gang violence.

Asghedom had a vision for the neighborhood, he sought to revitalize the community and be a role model for the local kids and the young black men in the community.

With many of his peers expressing their shock on social media, both the Hip Hop and LA community have lost a truly talented rap philantropolist. Asghedom is survived by his two children, a daughter from a previous relationship and a son with his longtime partner, Lauren London.

League One Look-ahead – What Happens Next?

With just seven games to go until the end of the season, there is still somehow 13 teams that could face relegation from English football’s third-tier. Will there be time for some final twists and turns?

You’ve heard of the promotion run-in, the top four clash, mid-table obscurity, or even the dreaded relegation battle. But there are relegation battles and then there’s League One. In what can only be described as a sort of ‘last man standing’ type of season, even at this late stage, any side in the bottom half of the table could realistically be relegated to League Two. A 24-team league, there are currently only 11 points separating Gillingham in 12th and bottom of the table Bradford City, who are on 36 points. Between Walsall, who currently occupy the final relegation spot and Gillingham, there are just five points.

This was the scene a week ago

To say League One has been ‘up for grabs’ this season would be an understatement. Much like what the Championship has become known for in recent years, it has very much been a case of anyone being able to beat anyone. You only need to look at Plymouth Argyle – who were bottom in October with just one win, but are now up to 14th – to see how volatile the division’s form book has been. By contrast, Rochdale, who now find themselves third from bottom, were 9 points clear on Boxing Day. It really is anyone’s guess on what happens from here.

This weekend

The nature of the division means that the upcoming round of fixtures now brings with it some huge games, but this weekend is certainly one to watch. 8 of the bottom half are all in action against one another, meaning the table could have a completely different feel to it come Sunday.

The biggest game of the weekend?
Source: Shropshire Live

Southend United and Shrewsbury Town face off at Roots Hall, with both teams hovering just above the relegation zone on 42 and 43 points respectively. In any other season this would be classed as a ‘relegation six-pointer’, but it could prove even more valuable this time. AFC Wimbledon will also look to continue their recent resurgence at Scunthorpe, knowing a win could bring them level to Southend and keep them in the relegation zone on goal difference alone.

Finally, Oxford against Wycombe and Gillingham vs Rochdale are the other games to look out for. While each of these sides has a bit of breathing space between themselves and the drop, they will know full well that any slip-ups will drag them well and truly back into the mix.

The run-in
Walsall fans could face the battle going down to the wire
Source: Vital Saddlers

Looking at the table now, realistically this could all go down to the final day of the season. Certainly for Walsall and Shrewsbury fans, who meet on 4th May; their season could be defined by this 90 minutes of football. Accrington Stanley are arguably in the best position, as they have two games in hand on most of their rivals around them. The first of these on Wendesday is a difficult match up with promotion-chasing Sunderland, but their game against Rochdale is simply a must-win.

The big fixtures come thick and fast for Shrewsbury too, who after this weekend face a relegation double-header with Scunthorpe and then Gillingham. Even the most optimistic of fans may become concerned if they come out of these three games empty handed. In truth, the only side who look certain to be relegated is bottom of the table Bradford City, currently six points adrift of safety and still facing difficult games against Doncaster Rovers and Coventry City.

Whichever four teams do go down this season can count themselves extremely unfortunate and know that in virtually any other season they could have well stayed up quite comfortably. The old adage of ’50 points’ being the safety mark is on course to be well and truly smashed this year.

England Shine Amidst Racism in Montenegro

England came back from 1-0 down to dispatch of Montenegro 5-1, with goals from Michael Keane, Ross Barkley, Harry Kane and in form Man City forward, Raheem Sterling.

This is the first time in over 30 years that England have scored five goals in consecutive games. However, another event ended up stealing the headline from Monday night’s game: racist abuse directed at a number England players, including full debutant, Callum Hudson-Edoi.

England Celebrate in Podgorica. Source: Reuters UK

After just six minutes into the Euro 2020 qualifier, BBC Radio 5 Live commentator Ian Dennis said he heard racist chants toward Tottenham left back, Danny Rose. Racist chants toward England players continued throughout the game, with pitch-side photographers describing the abuse as “disgusting”.

Raheem Sterling, who scored England’s fifth goal at 81 minutes, celebrated by cupping his ears towards the Montenegro fans indicating he can hear the chants. After the game, Sterling challenged governing footballing bodies to begin handing out “real punishments”. Sterling said to BBC Radio 5 Live, “A couple of idiots ruined a great night and it is a real sad thing to hear”.

“This place holds 15,000. The punishment should be, whatever nation it is, if your fans are chanting racist abuse then it should be the whole stadium so no one can come and watch. When the ban is lifted, the fans will think twice”.

This isn’t the first time Raheem Sterling has spoken out against racism in football. In December, Sterling shared a post on his Instagram condemning mainstream media outlets for the role of their unjustified negative portrayal of black players in fuelling racism in football. Following Monday night’s game, Sterling again took to social media to call out racist abuse:

England manager, Gareth Southgate, said the game’s incidents will be reported to Uefa, but this is not the first time England have flagged racist abuse towards their players. Danny Rose experienced racist chants in an under-21 game against Serbia in 2012. The punishment that ensued was a £65,000 fine to the Serbian FA and the under-21 team were subjected to playing one game behind closed doors.

Similar to Raheem Sterling, Kick It Out, an anti-discrimination charity, are also calling out the likes of Uefa to take harsher action against abuse from fans. Following yesterday’s game, Kick It Out said: “As we’ve argued countless times, it’s time for Uefa to take strong decisive action – fines won’t do. Extended stadium bans or tournament expulsion are what’s needed.

Sterling leading the call to action

Raheem Sterling is fast becoming a crucial change agent in the fight against discrimination in sport. His on pitch performance definitely aiding this as he’s having a career best season for both club and country, currently on form to record his highest goal tally with Manchester city netting 18 times already in all competitions, and taking home the match ball in England’s 5-0 win against Czech Republic on Friday.

Sterling joins Nike in campaign against racism in sport. Source: Hypebeast

As pressure mounts on the likes of Uefa to crack down on discrimination, Sterling must be praised for his boldness in showing players that they can use their platforms effectively to speak out against racism. With a social media following of over five million, Sterling has put the world on notice that racism is very much still an active issue in football today the “the people in charge” need to be held accountable of that, as they should be.

Arsenal legend, Ian Wright, spoke to ITV after the game and was also critical of Uefa’s tame efforts to tackle racism in football. Wright said, “It will probably go to Uefa and they’ll be fined a pittance and we’ll get the same thing again here the next time or somewhere else in Europe. It’s not going to stop them.” Sports Minister Mims Davies added, “Rightly very proud of the England players tonight – a fantastic effort and cracking result – in face of absolutely unacceptable racist abuse. Uefa must quickly investigate then take strong and swift action.”

Football fans across the world would have witnessed on Monday night the disgusting and unacceptable abuse England players received for the colour of their skin. The world will now be watching even harder to see what precedent will be set by Uefa in the ensuing punishment handed to the Montenegro FA. The passive approach of fines and one match closed games is not sending a message of abhorrence towards racism in football, and Uefa must be held accountable to sending one that will.

UEFA have charged Montenegro with racist behaviour in light of Monday’s game, and have subsequently opened an investigation which will culminate with a hearing in front of UEFA’s Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Board on 16th May 2019 where a verdict will be given.

Whose march is it anyway – is protest politically elitist?

With the ‘People’s vote’ march in London this weekend reportedly attracting crowds of over 1 million, the pro-Brexit ‘March to Leave’ was still taking place further north, but the small turnout provided some with great cause for laughter.

As the Brexit countdown comes ever closer to zero, the UK’s toxic atmosphere, both in and outside parliament shows no signs of dissipating. However, we saw a meaningful change over the weekend. As the government continued to languish in argument and indecision, the public decided to put on a clear display of ‘people power’ in an attempt to garner their attention.

After Theresa May announced she was not seeking a lengthy Brexit extension, the petition calling to revoke Article 50 gained extraordinary momentum and has, at the time of writing, over 5.7 million signatures. In the meantime, Saturday saw a million demonstrators descend on London demanding a ‘People’s Vote’.

The petition and in particular the march have been rightly celebrated as a perfect example of peaceful, passionate protest. Seeing those from different walks of life, all sporting bright colours and amusing slogans in a unified show of defiance which must be admired. Praise was similarly forthcoming for the infamous ‘Don’t attack Iraq’ worldwide demonstrations in 2003. The right to protest is a key cornerstone of a working democracy and on days like this, is regularly encouraged. It is however, disingenuous and unfair to suggest that this was the only credible form of protest seen this weekend.

Protesters begin their march from a rain-soaked Sunderland on 16th March
Source: AP/Metro

The ‘March to Leave’, which has been organised with the help of Nigel Farage is now into its 10th day, with the event set to conclude on 29th March; the day Britain was initially supposed to leave the European Union. Stretching 200 miles from Sunderland to Parliament Square in London, the march is no mean feat, but so far those participating have been met with nothing but ridicule.

On first glance, it is not difficult to see why. With just 350 people signed up and only 50 of those pledged to complete the entire walk, it is hardly the earth shattering blow to the Westminster ‘elite’ that some envisaged. Worse still, was that the event’s supposed figurehead Nigel Farage was largely nowhere to be seen, leaving the protesters to battle the elements alone.

Surely then, those taking part in the walk deserve a level of recognition rather than be treated with contempt? If protest is welcomed and encouraged in regards to progressive politics, does the same not apply for more conservative values? Of course, if those protesting are doing so in the name of a cause which preaches hate and prejudice like the English Defence League and their recent appropriation of the yellow vest movement, then this changes things somewhat.

‘Yellow vests’ in Manchester
Source: Morning Star

But while the argument about some Leave voters’ own personal rhetoric can certainly be made, the ‘March to Leave’ in itself is not representative of this. Just like the ‘People’s Vote’, it is simply normal people who are angry at the state of the government’s approach to Brexit. Nevertheless, as a result of the Leave campaign’s association with racist rhetoric, their right to protest feels as if it is being questioned. It is reminiscent of the discourse touched upon by the excellent theatre writer Lyn Gardner, in a piece titled ‘White van man has a story to tell too’. Here she asks whether only stories within very particular communities provide greater agency for artists to work with.

Politicians not people

Anyone who is frustrated about the state of Brexit should direct this frustration towards all the politicians and ‘businessmen’ that brought us to this point. Mocking those who voted for it and who are now fighting for their vote, is inflammatory and misplaced while playing the political blame-game does not equate to healthy debate. Twitter accounts and protest group Led By Donkeys are currently running a brilliant billboard campaign full of compromising past quotes from prominent Brexiteers. Initially paying for two ad-vans to drive beside the ‘March to Leave’, even they agreed this just didn’t feel right, making the statement below.

If blame continues to fall at the feet of members of the electorate, then we will have learned nothing from the last 3 years in politics. Back in 2016, it was this attitude which lead to the state of affairs that the UK currently finds itself in. Suppose then, that the ‘People’s Vote’ campaigners do eventually get their wish and the UK decides to remain in a second vote. In this eventuality, they simply must be prepared for demonstrations from Leave voters calling for a third ‘People’s Vote’ and another chance to exit the EU. While for some this doesn’t bear thinking about, any of these protests would have no less legitimacy than the current campaign. Both are wholly democratic.