On the 10th of January at 12:30pm, 31 year old Amir Khan announced his decision to sign with Eddie Hearn’s Matchroom Boxing. This is positive news for both his career, and the welterweight division. Khan hasn’t boxed since May 2016 and his spectacular KO at the hands of Canelo Alvarez, and he last fought in the UK in 2013. His return will therefore be highly anticipated by the wider boxing community.
‘I’m thrilled to be teaming up with Matchroom. This decision is not one I’ve taken lightly, as I’m at a hugely important time in my career, but having spoken to Eddie at length, it was clear he and I were on the same page in terms of what I want to be doing and what I still want to achieve.’
Once upon a time, boxers from Britain had to travel to America to make a suitable living. Now, with James Degale, Amir Khan and many others ‘returning home’ we are seeing the U.K. solidify itself as the new home of boxing.
“The plan is to box in April and then again in August or September in preparation for a super fight in winter 2018. The target is to provide him with the biggest fights possible, of course a British mega-fight with Kell Brook is top of that list along with the likes of Manny Pacquiao, Keith Thurman and Errol Spence Jr. I’m excited to get started and looking forward to a huge night of boxing on April 21 in Liverpool.”
Khan hasn’t fought more than twice a year since 2011 and it will be intriguing to see if the 31 year old’s body can hold up to the heavy demands of elite boxing. He has had many injuries in the past few years not to mention the public and messy feud with his wife, family and Anthony Joshua.
But Khan is in a new place now. Returning from his performance in ‘I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here’, he has a new lease of life and popularity. He made the public laugh with ‘Strawberry Gate’ and his ‘ladish’ behaviour. However, this is all well and good, but the key question is, can he still fight? Can he still mix it with the big boys of the division?
Khan’s return brings back many possible fights, but none more anticipated than a fight with Sheffield’s Kell Brook. The boxing community has called for the fight for years. Both are now former world champions. Both have tried and failed to step up to middleweight and both are looking to regain their titles; the scene could not be better set for a 2018 rumble.
Akwasi Appiah is a 3rd year Economics student at Queen Mary University. He has a strong passion for talent development and music. He has his own blog ‘akwasiappiah.com’ and has written for discussion outlets such as @OGGM_ and @DesiringGod.
Praise for Oprah Winfrey’s fiery and impassioned speech about the #TimesUp campaign at the Golden Globes have been making rounds on Twitter, however earlier in the morning ,when Ivanka Trump (daughter of president Trump) got involved, things took a sour turn.
She sought to stand in solidarity with the campaign, however, users on Twitter were quick to remind her of her fathers own battle with sexual assault accusers and the cloud that still hangs over the white house as he denies and settles a number of the accusations.
Winfrey said at the weekend: “For too long, women have not been heard or believed if they dare speak the truth to the power of those men. But their time is up. Their time is up.”
Ivanka referenced this speech, showing her support for Oprah as large swathes of Twitter users let her know that they did not support her.
Christine Teigen, a model and the wife of R&B singer John Legend, simply said
Alyssa Milano who is the star of the US series Charmed and Who’s the Boss?, made a suggestion to Ivanka, asking her to turn her words on Twitter to some financial support to the campaign.
Great! You can make a lofty donation to the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund that is available to support your father's accusers.https://t.co/A8HCVa715v
What did wearing all black at the Globes actually represent?
Considering all the accusations that were brought to light at the end of 2017 the “Time’s Up” initiative was started to support victims of sexual assault, not only in Hollywood but everywhere in the world. The initiative was thought of intime for people to show their support for the movement by wearing black to the Golden Globe awards.
While no one knows exactly why the colour black was chosen, there are many things that it can be said to represent.
Black may represent the people that have been blacklisted since speaking out.
Just seeing this after I awoke, I burst out crying. There it is, confirmation that Harvey Weinstein derailed my career, something I suspected but was unsure. Thank you Peter Jackson for being honest. I’m just heartsick https://t.co/ljK9NqICbm
There are actresses who claim to have been blacklisted after experiencing some sort of sexual assault in the industry. For people like Mira Sorvino, the accusation was confirmed last year in the light of the Weinstein Scandal by filmmaker Peter Jackson.
Black may represent mourning.
For a lot of people, they’re burying the old. They are saying that there is a new standard of accountability in Hollywood and that things must change. “And for too long, women have not been heard or believed if they dared to speak their truth to the power of those men. But their time is up. Their time is up. Their time is up.” Oprah Winfrey – Golden Globes 2018
Black is sleek
Black is known for being the colour that suits all. It is very possible that it was simply chosen because it is a colour that everyone would be able to look elegant in. Black is known for being the ‘in’ colour. It’s the reason we see that certain colours are referred to as ‘the new black’.
Black may represent strength
The strength of women like Tarana Burke (who founded the #MeToo campaign) has been exemplary in this period. Everyday women and activists have become the foundation of this movement, some of whom were seen to accompany some of the A-Listers to this years Golden Globes.
Not only did the Golden Globes feature an abundance of black this year, we also saw the introduction of the “Time’s Up” pin that was worn in support of the initiative. It was worn not only by women but by men too. We saw it worn from people like Justin Timberlake to the cast of Stranger Things. The pin shows a stance of solidarity with the victims and a sense of faith in the initiative itself.
Whilst wearing black and pins is a brilliant start, it can only mean something if the campaign doesn’t end here. There must be more action which is something we’re starting to see with the initiative. With a legal defence fund of over $16 million which is increasing daily, there is hope that eventually time will be up.
More can be read on the Time’s Up initiative at www.timesupnow.com.
After months of rumours and typical May-like indecisiveness, on the 8th of January 2018, the PM sought a cabinet reshuffle in an attempt to inject some much-needed life into her Brexit ‘suicide squad’.
Senior positions remained unchanged, but some new talent was added to the ranks especially the cabinet office.
Theresa May sought to strengthen her authority with the cabinet reshuffle EPA
However, despite her best efforts, for May, it appears as if, as soon as she has two good weeks, a bad one follows for good measure. Monday was no different. The headline from this reshuffle will be that after a tumultuous 2017, May is yet to consolidate authority over her own cabinet. If this is the case about her front line, what can we hope and expect as Brexit negotiations coalesce.
The reshuffle saw one senior minister refuse to move and another resign from the government.
Justine Greening, refused to move from Education to the Department for Work and Pensions, while Jeremy Hunt refused to move from his health post and even had his role expanded. Their defiance created chaos on a day on which Mrs May hoped to reinforce her authority.
Just In: Justine out
Mays plan was to move Greening to the Department for Work and Pensions, following reports that she had started cosying up to teaching unions and was not passionate about the governments’ policy of creating new grammar schools. Instead of this move, Greening hung May out to dry and resigned.
In a dig at the Government, Greening explained that she was standing down because enhancing “social mobility” meant more to her than a ministerial career.
Justine Greening leaving Downing Street after quitting Cabinet on Monday evening. Getty Images
According to the BBC, Friends close to Ms Greening explained that she expected to stay on, and that ‘other incompetent and disloyal MPs had been allowed to stay or given expanded briefs.’ The news, therefore, came to her as a shock.
Greens exit is a blow for the Conservative party. A party often criticised for its London centric outlook, Greening represented a fresh Northern perspective which some argue broadens the government reach and support. As also one of the few female and LGBT Cabinet ministers, her move back to the back-benches could be symbolic of the place of LGBT issues during this Brexit focused year.
Downing Street said that Mrs May was “disappointed” that Ms Greening, who remained inside Number 10 for more than three hours of tense talks, had declined the offer of the DWP. Damian Hinds was appointed education secretary after her departure.
Health Secretary is like a rash that won’t die.
Even staunch critics must now agree that Jeremy Hunt’s survival skills are commendable. Even though May had wanted to move Hunt, after protesting her decision and refusing to move, May was forced to keep him in health and also expand his role for good measure. He is now responsible for two of the biggest challenges facing the government, both of which provoke constant political heat and regular, high-profile pleas for extra billions of Treasury spending. Problems he must now deal with include, Britains ageing population, budgets, especially adult social care budgets, accident and emergency waiting times and much more.
Jeremy Corbyn (Leader of the Opposition) said the reshuffle was a “pointless and lacklustre PR exercise”.
Here are some tweets we found during the reshuffle,
The idea of a #cabinetreshuffle makes me think of turning over the compost heap on my allotment. Lots of worms and bugs come wiggling out but it's still the same old shit.
That Jeremy Hunt is allowed to remain as Health Secretary given his history with the NHS, and take on social care at a time of the worst #NHScrisis in history- is further reminder that Theresa May endorses his track record & cares not one jot for the public.#cabinetreshuffle
Last night were the 75th annual Golden Globe awards and there are only 3 questions on everyone’s mind. Who won? Who lost? Did they have a mix-up like the 2017 Oscars?
Here’s a breakdown of the categories and the winners and nominees
Best Motion Picture – Drama
Three Billboards Outside of Ebbing, Missouri (WINNER)
Dunkirk
The Post
The Shape of Water
Call Me By Your Name
Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy
Lady Bird (WINNER)
The Disaster Artist
Get Out
The Greatest Showman
I, Tonya
Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture Drama
Before you close the tab on this article, because you’ve seen a picture of a needle and have an adverse physical reaction/outer body experience to the sight, talk and mention of needles, hear me out.
In England alone, the NHS need over 6000 donations of blood a day to treat patients across the country, with one unit of blood-saving the life of up to three adults or seven infants. That’s not an insignificant number.
Every year, there is a shortfall of volunteers coming forward to donate blood, with figures plummeting for donors between the age of 17 to 34. NHS Blood and Transplant have claimed that around 200,000 blood donors are dropping off the register every year, and more vitally, donors from Black and Asian backgrounds.
You may have considered donating blood, and even recognise the importance of doing it, but for one reason or another, put it off. Here are some myth busters to motivate you to make your appointment!
1) I’m too busy..Netflix doesn’t watch itself you know.
I get it. An increasingly busier lifestyle, longer commutes, longer hours of work and a more hectic social life lend themselves to you to putting off a donation in favour of taking a well-deserved break. From experience, a donation (done with an appointment) can take around 30 minutes in total. That’s from stepping foot into the building to leaving with your free biscuit and cup of tea. There’s a really handy booking system that will allow you to pick from a number of locations near you, and a time that’s convenient for you from a morning session through to 7 pm! I’ve comfortably been able to walk to my closest donation centre in my hour lunch break, and be back in time for work with (did I mention) my free biscuit and cup of tea! And you can only donate once every 3 months which is 4 times a year. At half an hour each, 2 hours in a year is trade-able over your incessant scrolling on the Instagram explore page.
2) If a family member needs blood, I’ll whip my arm out then and they can take all that they need. Right?
Alright Thomas Beckket, calm your socks. Whilst I’m sure your family or friend entirely appreciates the sentiment in your offer, there are a number of reasons this can’t be done. Unless the recipient has an extremely rare blood type, and you happen to match it, it’s not logistically feasible to solely rely on grabbing the closest nurse and begging them to stab you with a needle. Hospitals have a blood bank, yes, just like the ones in Vampire Diaries…but without the Vampires (apparently), where they closely monitor the stock and replenish/put out calls for donations of specific types based on this. There are thorough medical checks to be done before they use the blood in another patient which can’t be facilitated on the spot.
3) Can’t they just uh….make some in a lab? Like in…True Blood?
Oddly, this is the second vampire reference I’m making, and the short answer is still no. We’ve not quite evolved medicine and technology in such a way where synthetic blood can be created to meet demand, which is odd considering it’s 2018 now and stranger things have happened like…Donald Trump.
4) Is it not *whispers* racist to say Black and Asian blood is more needed over others?
Though it’s no secret that BME donors are made of something special – capable of withstanding all the institutional racism and hate crime we’re subjected to in a world built for white men – giving blood isn’t defined by the outward semantics of where we live. Blood has the same functionality for everyone of any colour. Where it differs however, is the blood types from person to person. And, with there being more than 30 different blood types, you cannot ignore that some types are more common over others, and some are also in greater demand. Some blood types are simply more common in different ethnic groups, and that’s not racist to say!
According to the NHS, “Black people are more likely to have a rare subgroup called Ro. Ten times more likely than a white person. Many people with sickle cell disease need regular blood transfusions of healthy blood to stay alive. That means we need more Ro blood to help the growing number of patients with sickle cell disease.” and therefore more black donors. Its simple science.
Black people are more likely to have a rare subgroup called Ro. Ten times more likely than a white person. pic.twitter.com/1A6LIMXR5P
If none of those facts resonate with you, nor are you motivated by the ability to quite literally save a life (without that medical degree your mum wanted you to do at the age of 13), then rest assured, I have one final reason for you rooted in self-absorption and personal gain:
Free biscuits and a free cup of tea.*
Need I say more?**
*also on offer is orange squash, lemonade, coffee, crisps, raisins(who even takes those?), and shortbread.
**Snacks vary from donation centre to centre. Don’t @ me when they’ve run out of Clubs ok?
Uzma works full time in business sales at Telefonica. She is studying Politics, Philosophy and Economics part-time with Open University as a means to make sense of the world in which we exist! She is a v·inspired ambassador whose work revolves around empowering young people into volunteering and leadership. In her spare time, she enjoys musing in her blog and has writing pieces on faith and race, offering a more holistic perspective on current affairs. If she has any juice left by the end of the week, she creates Youtube videos for her channel Caruzmatic as well as run a small venture in selling her bespoke art for ucdesigns.co.uk
Utah Senator Orrin Hatch has announced that he will not be standing for an eighth term of office when his seat is contested later this year. This would potentially pave the way for former presidential candidate Mitt Romney to return to front-line politics. Despite his age – Hatch will turn 84 in March – he had been considering re-running, having been strongly encouraged by Donald Trump to do so. Hatch has been a political ally to Trump since the latter was elected president. He’s contributed to Trump’s tax reforms in his role as chairman of the Senate finance committee, as well as suggesting that Trump could go on to become the greatest US president in history.
President Trump with the retiring Orrin Hatch (source: Michael Reynolds/EPA)
While losing a generally favourable figure in the Senate, Trump would most certainly be gaining an adversary were Romney to run and be ultimately successful. Romney was a vociferous critic of Trump throughout the 2016 election campaign, describing him as a “phony” and notably implying in an interview that he had an obligation to his grandchildren to stop Trump becoming president. Trump fired back accusing Romney of “choking like a dog” during his unsuccessful presidential run in 2012. Even a potential thawing of their relationship after Trump won the presidential election, with the two meeting for dinner and even discussing Romney’s possible suitability for the Secretary of State position has not led to constant reconciliation; Romney has since denounced Trump’s response to the racial tensions in Charlottesville and his endorsement of Judge Roy Moore despite his alleged sexual misconduct.
Mitt Romney had his chance to beat a failed president but he choked like a dog. Now he calls me racist-but I am least racist person there is
Indeed, if he is elected, Romney may not have to downplay his distaste for the president in the same way that many other congressional Republicans have felt is necessary for their own electoral interests. For one, Romney is already a leading political figure within the GOP. An up-and-coming member of Congress may risk losing out on a long and illustrious career by antagonising a president hailing from their own party. This is particularly true with Trump in power, whose Twitter tirades against even mild critics have become infamous, often inundating them with unwanted publicity. Romney, however, has a high enough profile, having previously served as governor of Massachusetts as well as being a presidential nominee, to survive being persona non grata at the White House without fear of his political reputation being ruined.
Romney and Trump’s infamous dinner after the latter was elected president (source: Getty images)
Arguably a more important reason why Romney may be emboldened to challenge Trump’s actions, however, is the Utah seat he would be running for. Despite being almost as comfortably Republican as you can get (the state hasn’t voted for a Democrat for president since 1964), Utah voters do not necessarily espouse a Trump-type Republicanism. Instead their politics is generally defined more by an evangelical conservatism than Trump’s aggressive nationalism. This makes them perhaps less likely to forgive Trump’s past transgressions such as his comments about women or his support for Moore, which may not be consistent with their own religious values. In fact, remarkably for a Republican president, Trump’s approval ratings in the state only remain positive by the finest margins. Romney, in comparison, is likely to be popular among Utahns given that he, like approximately 60% of the state’s population, is of the Mormon faith and will likely share similar values with them. This means Romney would probably have little to fear from voting against or criticising Trump in the Senate, given that he would likely be more in tune with the views of his electorate in Utah than Trump would be, and would thus not risk losing his seat.
If Romney does decide to stand for Hatch’s vacated seat, which he is rumoured to have expressed a private interest in, the stage could be set for internal strife within the Republican party.
The first day of January signifies the first day of the winter transfer window and with that comes speculations and transfer rumours surrounding several players who either couldn’t force a move in the summer, or their transfer talks broke down. For most players, especially players of champions league or Europa league clubs, moving in January seems like a bit of a silly idea because the individual would be cup tied. For Liverpool, the ongoing saga of Philippe Coutinho continues as Barcelona are once again making their interest known.
Coutinho the 25-year-old Brazilian attacking mid-fielder dubbed the little magician, has played 152 games for Liverpool and scored 41, this season alone he’s scored 15 goals and made 8 assists. He’s very influential with his style of play having amazing technical ability using his close control dribbling, agility and pace to hurt defences, whilst also being able to provide for his teammates. In the Premier League, he has really stood out and because of this he’s a very exciting prospect.
Barcelona have taken notice and are soon to put a bid of what is to be rumoured around £130 million, all this would be wild speculation if there wasn’t so many credible accounts that were reporting on this. Even Nike on their website had already started advertising Barcelona shirts with Coutinho shirt prints on the back, of course this was quickly taken down; someone must have had a nightmare at the office that day. Nike and Barcelona have yet to comment on this. With this kind of transfer offer Liverpool will surely have to react, especially with the recent buy of Southampton defender Virgil van Dijk who cost them approximately £70 million. They may use the money to cover that cost and possibly buy another player like Thomas Lemar from Monaco who also has interest from Arsenal and Chelsea.
There is also speculation that Coutinho doesn’t want to play for Liverpool again which is supposedly what is forcing the move. He played in their victory against Leicester but didn’t play against Burnley as Jürgen Klopp cited that he had suffered a thigh injury which seems coincidental.
For Liverpool, the ideal situation would be for Coutinho to sign a pre-contract to Barcelona and allow him to leave in the summer so that their chances of finishing in the top 4 and progressing in the Champions league would be better with him in the team. With the addition of Naby Keita coming from RB Leipzig next season this looks like the best solution. Although I personally believe Liverpool will be fine without him with the amount of quality they have in their team with the likes of Mo Salah, Firminho and Mane at their disposal. Right now, their biggest worry should be sorting out their defence.
Hopefully by the end of next week there will be a final conclusion.
In October last year, Piers Morgan, Good Morning Britain’s current presenter, was called out for “slandering” and “lashing out” on a guest who identifies them self as gender fluid. According to the Collins dictionary, gender fluidity is “not identifying exclusively with one sex rather than another”. A person who identifies them self as gender fluid trusts that they can wake up one day and are ‘man’ and wake up another day a ‘woman’. They don’t believe that being born one sex limits them to being one gender.
Gender neutral clothing is something that had been commercially introduced in 2017. John Lewis, one example of a shop selling gender neutral clothing, decided that they would no longer be selling clothes targeted and labelled only at and for ‘boys’ and ‘girls’, but clothes for both i.e. gender neutral clothing. This change caused an uproar. Many were shocked and disgusted at the shop’s decision. Some struggle to understand why their young child should be allowed to pick out clothing that goes against societies norm. For example, a little boy picking a dress or a little girl picking a blue top with a race car on it. John Lewis wanted to allow freedom of choice in their children’s clothing collection and that’s exactly what they did. They believe that children should be allowed to pick their gender and not have gender forced onto them. Someone commented on twitter, “Jesus gender neutral clothing isn’t the end of the world it’s just literally allowing children to express themselves freely. OUT OF CHOICE”.
Piers Morgan was one of the many who commented on the shop’s brave change. On twitter he wrote, “Britain is officially going bonkers”. People who supported the change commented on Piers Morgan’s “lack of an open mind”.
Piers Morgan made it clear that he doesn’t agree with the idea of people being both male and female. He stated to his guest on Good Morning Britain, “My problem with this is you can’t be male or female… You’re born one or the other. If you want to have an operation fine… I just don’t get this gender fluid stuff.”
Twitter went crazy. There were many different opinions being thrown out and some people put forth some really strong arguments. It’s clear that a huge amount of people support Morgan’s opinion of gender fluidity being ‘absurd’. On twitter, someone asked, “Why is gender fluidity so alien to you Piers, are you actually closed minded or is this just for column inches?”, Piers didn’t respond to this but someone else commented, “I agree with Piers. The world’s going mad! We’re born male or female unless medical reasons determine differently.”
Interestingly, Piers made it known on social media that he didn’t support gender fluidity but he has no issue with people having sex changes, right after he announced that Caitlyn Jenner would be coming on his show.
*BREAKING NEWS* Airing on Thursday, my first ever Life Stories show with a transgender celebrity, @Caitlyn_Jenner. And what a life story it is! From male Olympic champion to Kardashian dad, to trans woman. An unmissable & fiery (!) watch… *THURSDAY, ITV, 9PM * pic.twitter.com/Twz5Dbcus7
Piers managed to find a way to “rile up” Caitlyn Jenner through his question “How does your physique compare now to what it was then? Obviously certain areas we know…”
The real question is, why does Piers Morgan not support people’s decision to identify themselves as whatever they want to be? Is it a crime to want to be free? The world is changing every day and does being this closed-minded not limit people’s freedom of expression?
Hannah Bamgbala was born in London and is of Nigerian descent. She is passionate about freedom of expression in both Africa and photography. Hannah is currently a Fashion Media and Promotion student at The University For The Creative Arts Rochester and is looking to pursue journalism, photography and styling once she graduates.
The remarkable political situation in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, with enough intrigue, manipulation and scandal to make a Game of Thrones scriptwriter raise their eyebrows, has taken its latest twist. It comes through the intervention of Rajinikanth, a film star who can perhaps be best described as a kind of South Indian Chuck Norris. The 67 year-old confirmed his much-teased entry into the political world by announcing the first steps towards the formation of a new political party, one which will contest every seat in the Tamil Nadu legislative elections scheduled to be held in 2021.
The battle to replace a political heavyweight
The state is currently in the throes of a power vacuum, with uncertainty reigning ever since the death of J Jayalalitha, the then-Chief Minister, in December 2016. Herself a famed actor in Tamil cinema before turning to politics, Jayalalitha had risen to become the dominant political force in the region, having served a total of 14 years as Chief Minister, over six terms of office. Earlier in 2016, she had become the first Chief Minister in over 30 years to win direct re-election, exemplifying her popular influence in a state defined by the almost constant alternation of political power.
Jayalalitha, until her death the leading political figure in Tamil Nadu
The year since Jayalalitha’s death has seen her party, the ruling All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) riven with infighting and controversy. V K Sasikala, Jayalalitha’s former aide and protegee, had been one of the frontrunners to succeed her in the long term. Yet amidst swirling tabloid rumours about the nature of her relationship with Jayalalitha and the role her family may have played in the Chief Minister’s death, Sasikala was jailed on charges of corruption, ruling out perhaps the most natural successor to Jayalalithaa.
This twist left the race for succession contested by two senior AIADMK officials: Edappadi K Palaniswami and O Panneerselvam (helpfully known as EPS and OPS respectively). After a lengthy power struggle that saw EPS wrest the mantle of Chief Minister away from OPS, the two eventually agreed to (at least temporarily) bury the hatchet with an uneasy power sharing arrangement, with OPS settling for the position of Deputy Chief Minister. However, as is often the case with reluctant alliances, voters have not welcomed this new-look AIADMK, with the party suffering a high-profile by-election defeat to party rebel TTV Dinakaran in the seat vacated by Jayalalitha.
Meanwhile, the main opposition party, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), has similarly failed to capture the voters’ imagination. Its leader, the 93 year-old M. Karunanidhi, is also a five-time Chief Minister, having first served in the role as early as 1969. It appears the he and his son, the interestingly named Stalin, are suffering from their inability to offer any substantial deviation from the status quo, given their candidate at the recent by-election performed so poorly that he forfeited his deposit. Overall, Tamil voters’ confidence in the two main parties appears to be nearing rock bottom.
The movie star makes his big entrance
At this stage, you’d be forgiven for struggling to keep up with the runners and riders in the race for power in Tamil Nadu. In a sense, though, this is the whole point. Tamil voters are seeing a range of figures vying for the upper hand in the political free-for-all since Jayalalitha’s death, but amidst the chaos no one name stands out as an obvious and convincing successor ahead of all the rest. This may be precisely why Rajinikanth has chosen this particular moment to make his intervention.
T 2758 – My dear friend , my colleague and a humble considerate human, RAJNIKANTH, announces his decision to enter politics .. my best wishes to him for his success !!?? pic.twitter.com/dByrmlZb2c
Often the recipient of Chuck Norris-esque jokes such as this, Rajinikanth boats a massive popular following
In a cinema-loving state such as this, the much-beloved action hero offers name recognition and a familiar face to voters in search of a strong and effective leader. Announcing his intention to join the political scene now enables Rajinikanth to best capitalise on the present power vacuum, capturing the attention of the Tamil electorate ahead of the other, less charismatic political figures. Equally, this still provides plenty of time for him and his party to develop their political platform and demonstrate their credibility in running for office before the elections in three years’ time.
What does his announcement mean for politics in the state?
The statement in which Rajinikanth declared his political intentions was as vague as it was dramatic. He described the events since Jayalalithaa’s death as having turned the state into a national “laughing stock”, and suggested he was only entering politics now out of a sense of duty rather than any personal ambition. His scathing attack on the status quo of course went down well among the adoring supporters present at the speech, but it was not matched by much in the way of policy detail or ideological stances.
The closest Rajinikanth came to offering any substantial indication of a specific outlook came through his assertion that “we need a spiritual politics”. While this may not seem like much, the term ‘spiritual’ can be seen to have significant connotations in traditionally secular South India. Combined with a quotation his speech took from the Hindu religious text Bhagavad Gita, this has led many to suggest that Rajinikanth will offer something of a break from Tamil Nadu’s secular consensus and instead place an emphasis on Hinduism in policy-making, in line with the governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at a national level. If this is indeed the case, the BJP would surely attempt to take advantage of such a popular figure espousing consistent views with theirs by forming a political alliance with him, to make inroads in a state where they have previously had little success. A move towards a more pro-Hindu outlook may also provoke increasing sectional tensions with Tamil Nadu’s substantial Muslim population, as has been visible since the BJP rose to power in many other states, but which Tamil Nadu itself has largely avoided.
Rajinikanth (left) with Prime Minister Narendra Modi
However, Rajinikanth’s political career is of course in its infancy. Until he and his new party are able to articulate a coherent policy platform we can rely only on speculation as to what his entry will mean for politics in the state and perhaps beyond it. However it plays out, the situation in Tamil Nadu is certainly worth keeping an eye on.
New York Times announced that over 300 actresses, female agents, writers, directors, producers and executives have created an initiative called Time’s Up to fight sexual harassment in Hollywood and worldwide.
The initiative was announced with a pledge to support working class women. The open letter was signed by hundreds of popular celebrities and it ran as a full ad page in both the New York Times and in the La Opinion – a Spanish newspaper.
The initiative includes a legal defence fund with recieved $13 million in donations to help women in all positions to report sexual misconduct without fallout, legislation to penalise companies that allow harassment, and to discourage the use of non-disclosure agreements to silence victims. There has already been headway made in a drive to have equal male and female numbers in studios. A request was also made that women attending the Golden Globes who were walking down the red carpet wear black and speak out against harassment.
After an open letter was signed by 700,000 female farmworkers declaring their support for the women in Hollywood who were fighting against the abuse they’d received, the #MeToo campaign was criticised for not being inclusive of women anywhere. It was seen as a campaign that only cared about the abuse within Hollywood. With the Hollywood executives being targeted, it looked as though even though women all around the world stood with those attacked, those attacked only stood with Hollywood. The Time’s Up initiative allows for women around the world in all positions to feel the same unity.
Shonda Rhimes, executive producer and creator of Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal and How to get away with Murder said “It’s very hard for us to speak righteously about the rest of anything if we haven’t cleaned our own house…If this group of women can’t fight for a model for other women who don’t have as much power and privilege, then who can?”
Some of the women included in the Time’s Up initiative are Shonda Rhimes, America Ferrera, Eva Longoria, Rheese Witherspoon, Jennifer Aniston and Nina L. Shaw.
American youtuber Logan Paul shared an intense video with his fanbase of over 15 million subscribers. The video showed him going into Aokigahara, known to some as “suicide forest” in Japan. He walks through the forest looking for ‘scary’ and ‘haunted’ things and he happens to come across a body. Paul proceeds to show closeups of the body where he only blurs out the face and when someone off camera mentions that they don’t feel good, Paul is heard saying “What, you never stand next to a dead guy?” and laughs.
Logan Paul posted an apology on twitter apologising for his actions saying that “I’m often reminded of how big of a reach I truly have & with great power comes with great responsibility… for the first time in my life I’m regretful to say that I handled that power incorrectly. It won’t happen again”. He has had an out pouring of support from some of his fans but for the most part we have seen plenty of people criticising him for not having the foresight to edit that part out of the vlog or to even have been less crass with the way he dealt with the situation.
Mr Paul has stated in the video that he has opted to turn off the money making option for that video. He said that his intention was to raise awareness of suicide and “make a positive ripple on the internet, not cause a monsoon of negativity.”
Whilst some people have called on the YouTube community to take action against the video, others have been more worried about the fact that Mr Paul’s fan base consists mainly of young children who have now watched a man they admire make jokes about suicide and death.
It begs the question, how far is too far? What will people do for money, for fame, for views? Most importantly, when do we as the pubic decide that enough is enough. Should stop allowing people to monetize off of people’s pain, or is it just another facet of human nature?
Following 2016’s shocking electoral twists and turns often ending up favouring the so-called ‘populist’ right, the past year can be seen to have heralded some semblance of business as usual. Some suggested at the start of 2017 that the various European elections represented mere ‘dominoes to fall’ to insurgent far-right parties in the wake of victories for Donald Trump and the ‘Leave’ campaign in the USA and the UK respectively. However, in many cases those in the centre and on the left have rallied to hold back the nationalist tide.
A French election poll suggesting Le Pen was less convincing than Macron (source: Vox)
At the start of the year, elections taking place in France, Germany and the Netherlands were seen to be the key battlegrounds contested in Europe. In addition, UK Prime Minister Theresa May’s surprise decision to call a snap general election provided another opportunity for the political right to gain ground. In the Dutch and French elections, however, positive early polling for radical right parties soon gave way to disappointing electoral results at the hands of centrist parties. Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom (PVV) lost out to the liberal-conservative People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) in the case of the former, while the latter concluded with Marine Le Pen of the National Front (FN) being comfortably beaten by Emmanuel Macron in the second round of voting. In the UK, meanwhile, the Conservative Party’s overall embrace of Brexit encouraged by May did not yield success at the ballot box, as the party failed to secure an overall majority despite expecting to win comfortably. In Germany there was solace to be found for the Far-right, with Alternative for Germany (AfD) winning a substantial proportion of legislative seats despite a traditional lack of success for such parties in the country’s recent history.
European far right’s % of voter share, 2017 elections
Le Pen/France 21.3% PVV/Netherlands 13.1% AfD/Germany 12.6% UKIP/UK 1.8%
Taken together, these results suggest that the populist right’s battle for political supremacy is likely to rage on for the foreseeable future. The electoral events unfolding over the past year in Europe suggest that the right’s ascendancy is far from assured. Many such parties experienced what can only be described as failures given the high expectations set by the previous year’s breakthroughs. Indeed, many members and supporters of centre and left-leaning parties may rightly feel more assured of their continued political longevity than they would have a year or so previously, in the face of Trump, Brexit, and the ominous-looking polling figures for their own national elections.
Dutch voters protest against the far right PVV (Source: Getty Images)
Yet nor does this right-wing phenomenon show any signs of letting up. The rise of the AfD at the expense of both of Germany’s major parties represents a remarkable breakthrough, while even disappointments for Le Pen and Wilders can only be considered as such in the context of a far-right surge; they still mark much stronger performances than were the norm for far-right parties a few years previously. The presence of these parties is also reflected in the shifting rhetoric of apparently ‘mainstream’ parties. While May’s Conservatives position themselves as unashamedly pro-Brexit, the VVD announced its support for a burka ban, thereby legitimising ideas which were once excluded from the political agenda. Looking back at 2017 can therefore tell us that despite not always having the rub of the green, the populist right will not back down without a serious fight.
Social Media is a fantastic platform with a mindboggling myriad of functionality. In the past year alone, we’ve seen social media bring criminals to justice, provide ordinary people with extraordinary job opportunities, been a means of free chicken nuggets for a whole year as well as my personal favourite, given us the meme calendar(!) with monthly updates telling us the meme of the month. For the majority of us, social media is mostly a means of expression from voicing disdain at South Western Railways, to solidarity with grassroots political movements like #BlackLivesMatter. You simply cannot fault the overwhelming positive impact sites like Twitter, Instagram and (sometimes) even Facebook have had socially, economically and politically especially for POC (people of colour).
Somewhere along the way, within the lines of coding, the creators, developers and engineers, forgot to add that algorithm that helps us navigate through social media when things get a bit too much. The constant scrolling, continuous absorption, endless streams of information (good and bad), fruitless comparisons is surely having effects on us in ways that we perhaps never prepared for. The digital world, and the technology in it, is still relatively new and one of our oversights as a species is underestimating the potency with which social media taints our wellbeing. Consumption of information feels to have dramatically shifted our attention span limiting our availability to ten second videos (fifteen if you’re on Instagram). It’s so easy for us to go from one tweet informing us of the meme of the month, to the next showing graphic images of a bomb blast in Kabul. This constant feed of information combined with our own outrage through our tweets, statuses and ‘grams’ has led to a somewhat unhealthy addiction to the euphoric high of instant gratification coupled with downward spiralling self-worth. The more you absorb, the more you compare, the more you soberly look to your own life, searching for the perfect angle, striving for the hottest take, building up to a perfectly curated version of yourself, and the more frustrated and hopeless you begin to feel. Does it ring a bell?
According to a study done earlier this year, British millennials have the “second worst mental wellbeing in the world”, following Japan by levels of stress and anxiety. I’m not by any means reducing the research to a direct result of social media because I don’t believe correlation is causation. I simply recognise that there’s an added layer of difficulty and coupled with my own experiences of falling victim to the cycle of narcissism in pockets of social media, I offer a few pieces of advice to successfully steer murky waters.
Don’t compete with anyone online
As tempting as it is to compare yourself with peers that are buying their first house, publishing a book, or being quoted in Forbes – don’t! I can almost guarantee that you’ll wake up feeling more satisfied if you’re able to take a step away from the urgency of knowing what everyone else is doing and focus on how you want to improve on the person you were yesterday. That’s how you make waves.
Measure your own success by the process, not the results
In a relentless rush towards the finish line, you lose sight very quickly of the importance of the journey. You may never even arrive at the finish line, and that’s okay! Take comfort in the warmth of the process, celebrate the small successes and appreciate that you’re human with limited capabilities on rainy days as well as the oomph you radiate on the sunny ones.
Take a break from social media every 3 months!
Perhaps you’ve a personality that remains bulletproof from the narcissism projected online, but for everyone else, a couple of days away from the chaos of internet personalities shouting for your attention allows you an opportunity to recuperate and reenergise. This is wholly important for activists who feel like their purpose online revolves around correcting, advising, and re-claiming their narratives, because it’s more tiring than you may ever allow yourself credit for.
Adopting subtle changes in your day-to-day existence online will allow you to feel liberated and allow you the room to breathe in an increasingly suffocating and connected world and importantly give you the strength to fight your battles with enough vigour and resolve because Lord knows we’re relying on you!
Uzma works full time in business sales at Telefonica. She is studying Politics, Philosophy and Economics part –time with Open University as a means to make sense of the world in which we exist! She is a v·inspired ambassador whose work revolves around empowering young people into volunteering and leadership. In her spare time she enjoys musing in her blog and has writing pieces on faith and race, offering a more holistic perspective on current affairs. If she has any juice left by the end of the week, she creates Youtube videos for her channel Caruzmatic as well as run a small venture in selling her bespoke art for ucdesigns.co.uk