Home Blog Page 5

We need to change the narrative on refugees and asylum seekers

The Common Sense Network sat down with Moses Seitler, Founder of Screen Share, a UK based charity focused on repurposing laptops for refugees and asylum seekers, to discuss the role digital inclusion plays in switching the current narrative and empowering refugees and asylum seekers. 

Can you tell us a bit about your motivations for setting up Screen Share?

I set up Screen Share for two very different reasons. The first was because I needed a solution to the problem that my clients were facing. I was supporting dozens of young refugees for Refugee Education UK as they sought to access higher education, and they were all trying to do it off a shared phone or broken laptop. The sector had no clear solution to this problem and yet their support was conditional upon our clients having access to the right device.

The second reason was because I was drawn to this cause because of my family history. Just before my great grandfather arrived in the UK having fled pogroms in Poland, the UK passed the 1905 Aliens Act. This was the first piece of legislation specifically designed to prevent refugees from coming to the UK. That policy was obviously unsuccessful and harmful, as is the new legislation today. More than 100 years on, politicians refuse to accept that policy needs to respond to the movement of people, not the other way around. Anyone who knows anything about migration appreciates that policy is not a real pull-factor.

When it comes to advocating for more humane policies, Screen Share keeps it simple. We are not policy specialists, but we do think that every person seeking sanctuary in the UK has the right to access the support services and arms of state which, in today’s day and age, are fundamentally digital.

How do you hope tech can help refugees and help empower them in society?

British refugee policy since the 20th century can be described simply as ‘fine, if it works for us’. The government does not yet realise that an answer to their policy headache is to include refugees in the policy conversation. For that to happen, they need to be digitally included.  

The path of empowerment is as follows: give refugees the right digital tools and they will use those tools to wrestle back control of their lives. This may be applying for and thriving in education or employment to build their futures. It’s also very present – digitally excluded people cannot work effectively with lawyers to further their case, and they cannot apply for Universal Credit or coordinate with their local council. It’s not rocket science – put your laptop in a cupboard for a week and let me know how much progress you have made.

Children evacuated from Afghanistan disembark from an RAF plane at Brize Norton in August 2021. Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty Images

Can you tell us how Screen Share and the wider charity sector is responding to the recent Illegal Migration Bill?

The bill is a reflection of the government’s reckless approach to policymaking. The government’s bet is a simple accumulator: being incredibly harsh on refugees will be electorally beneficial AND will dissuade other refugees from seeking sanctuary in the UK.  The fact that the government refuses to issue a policy impact assessment is all the proof we need that this policy is irrelevant to what we really need, which is a fair, evidence-based settlement for an immigration policy which respects the unique moral claims to protect refugees in that context. 

The sector is being represented by the big names who are doing all they can – Refugee Council, Refugee Action and an amalgamation of organisations called Together With Refugees. They’re organised, and we are doing a good job of foregrounding people with lived experience who are bravely advocating for people who are in similar positions to them. The issue is that the government isn’t listening or willing to negotiate. They weren’t listening last year when we spent hours contributing to the consultation on the Nationality and Borders Bill. They haven’t been listening for years. 

What is your vision for Screen Share?

We are trying to build a sustainable, go-to tech organisation for refugees. We want sanctuary seekers who see digital as a route out of their current situation to be able to come to us, receive support and then ultimately have an opportunity to run the organisation themselves. Refugees are more likely to face digital exclusion than any other minority group and do so with greater consequences when they do, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be tomorrow’s leaders. 

In terms of the journey of that growth, we need a few things. We need financial support, so our staff keep pushing and do what they do best. We need volunteers, to process these laptops and keep finding others. And we need to scale, by setting up hubs across the country in which normal people can give up their time to refurbish and deliver devices to those who need them. 

You can read more about Screen Share here: Screen-Share.co.uk

The charity was also featured on the BBC’s We Are England, Education: From Conflict to Classroom here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001c9tn/we-are-england-education-from-conflict-to-classroom


Zohaib Sadiq is a wirter and dedicated individual; an alumni from The University of Manchester (where he read Politics, Philosophy and Economics, and was an Official International Ambassador in Paris and London), he currently writes thoughtful pieces on social, political and economic issues for The Common Sense Network. Zohaib is motivated by the power of speaking the truth to create impactful narratives and the sternly held conviction that the pen is mightier than the sword.

Labour Party on track to win a 140-seat majority at the next election

Labour would win 470 seats to just 129 for the Tories and 26 for the SNP.

The Labour Party is on track to win a 140-seat majority at the next election, with Keir Starmer set to be Prime Minister a new poll shows.

The poll, carried out for campaign group Best For Britain, suggests that were a general election to be held tomorrow, Labour would win 470 seats to just 129 for the Tories and 26 for the SNP.

The MRP analysis is the first to take into account new boundary changes at the next general election and shows that Labour would win 35% of the vote while the Conservatives would win 23%, according to the poll conducted by Focaldata.

The research carried out for Best for Britain also found that 206 of 632 seats in Britain are marginal, with Labour either in first or second place in 197 of these narrowly held constituencies.

Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer MP on visit to Manchester and Oldham.

However, polling experts urged caution and warned that there could still be a hung parliament if right-wing party Reform UK stands aside in Tory marginal seats and if a large group of undecided voters opt for the Tories.

Naomi Smith, the CEO of Best for Britain, told a press conference in London: “Our analysis of that data is that actually Labour could more plausibly be looking at 370 seats, and even that might be at the high end that we’re predicting, with the Conservatives on 232.

“Neither of those scenarios has to happen independently of one another. They can both happen at the same time. And if they do, if a lot of those undecided voters break back to the Conservatives and we see Reform UK pulling candidates, then we’re back in hung Parliament territory.”

Naomi Smith also said that while Labour’s lead “looks healthy”, their margins are “falling everywhere” and their lead is smaller than their last poll conducted in Autumn 2022.

She also said that Rishi Sunak had won back some voters disaffected by Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng’s disastrous mini-budget.

But even in a worst-case scenario for Labour, it would still be the biggest party in a hung parliament, according to the analysis.

The survey asked 10,140 people in Great Britain between April 20 and May 9 which party they would vote for if a general election were held tomorrow.

Dive into the Deep: The Future is AI

A brief explainer on AI: what it is, where did it come from and why is it surfacing now?

In 1996, IBM’s Deep Blue computer made history by becoming the first artificial intelligence (AI) system to defeat Kasparov, the world chess champion. Cut to 25 years later; ChatGPT is released. It broke records, quickly becoming the fastest-adopted technology in history, reaching one million users in five days and 100 million users in two months.

To put that into perspective, just to hit 1 million users, it took Facebook 10 months and Spotify five. As many in the industry are calling it a ‘Google-level event’ we could all learn a little more. I have dived into the issue so that you don’t have to, here is what I found. 

What is Artificial Intelligence?

At its core, artificial intelligence refers to machines capable of performing tasks that typically require human-like thinking processes. These can include learning from experiences, understanding language and context, recognising patterns or objects, and problem-solving. 

It’s important to note that today’s explainer mostly focuses on ‘narrow AI’. The AI straight out of sci-fi is called ‘General AI’ (also known as strong or true AI) which represents a more advanced form of artificial intelligence. It envisions machines possessing cognitive abilities similar to humans – being able to learn from experience, independently, without any pre-programming. However, despite significant progress in recent years most estimations seem to suggest that this level remains pretty far from reality (at the time of writing).

Robot Kid reading his book (Unsplash)

Why now?

Put simply; it just started to get good. It became comparable to humans in desirable tasks; chess is one thing but creating art, processing concepts, and comprehension of language is quite another. This has led to further funding which has led to greater development. As time has gone on, processors have become better, improving our ability to train AI, and leading to better outputs. The reality is that this has been built on for decades; Deep Blue sparked conversations in the late 90s but there is a history going back far further than that. 

AI’s journey has been marked by milestones of innovation. Despite its complex nature, understanding AI’s historical timeline can shed light on its future potential. The first real breakthroughs were in the 1940s and 1950s with Alan Turing and the breaking of the Enigma code. But developments continued up until the late 60s before the AI “winter” which paused most development due to high expectations and limited technology. 

In 1995, the chatbot Alice was developed and IBM completed their development of Deep Blue. In 1996, Deep Blue went to play Kasparov and the rest is history. There was a rematch in ’97 and Deep Blue beat him again. 

From there, the focus shifted towards neural networks, which attempt to copy living brains by merging human and machine ways of thinking. This gave rise to deep learning which involves multiple layers of neural networks, optimising the learning process. This led directly to investment from major companies, which is why we have AI-powered assistants like Siri and Alexa. 

In 2021, OpenAI’s GPT-3 demonstrated advanced language understanding, capable of generating human-like text based on given prompts. Then in 2022 AI exploded and ChatGPT’s release in December was just the beginning. AI has been there all along, but ChatGPT changed the game.  

A conversation on AI with some of our writers at Common Sense

From big business to open source

In early May 2023, a leaked memo from Google warned that it, and other companies, have already lost the AI race. It states that the company is falling behind in the development of language models, particularly in comparison to the rapid progress being made in the world of open-source which is utilising Facebook’s LLaMA model, leaked earlier in the year. 

Key innovations that have emerged from the world of open-source include the ability to run major models on personal devices, the creation of scalable personal artificial intelligence, and the emergence of art and text models without restrictions. While Google’s models still hold a minor edge in terms of quality, the memo reported that this gap is rapidly closing. The memo also suggests that Google needs to prioritise collaboration with these developers; who will soon be able to do the same work for a fraction of the cost. 

The Rise of Generative AI

Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, has emerged as an upcoming and promising field of artificial intelligence. It leverages machine learning algorithms that can generate new outputs (such as images, texts, or sounds) based on input data. This ability to create novel content without explicit human direction sets generative AI apart from other forms.

Fears Associated with Generative AI

Obviously, there are several concerns surrounding AI and its development. Among these fears is that it may replace human labour in various fields – leading to job displacement and increasing social inequality.

In the near term, there are worries about the accuracy of AI. Mistakes, dubbed ‘hallucinations’, are still a key issue requiring a user to check the efficacy of the information. While many are concerned with the licensing of the words, pictures and sounds that generative AI scrapes from the wider internet.

Furthermore, fears that AI will be used by bad actors have raised ethical concerns. This has largely been picked up in conversations relating to misinformation and disinformation with anxieties ranging from the creation of deep fake videos by foreign powers; to worries that lazy outlets will not verify content before it hits the reader. Without regulation and consumer protection, AI could pose severe risks to safety and clean news flows in the near to immediate future.

Potential Benefits Realized by Generative AI Technology

Despite these concerns, it’s essential not to overlook the numerous benefits offered by generative artificial intelligence systems when harnessed responsibly. The creative capabilities enabled by this technology can revolutionise industries from art to professional services and finance.

Additionally, for businesses, automated processes powered by AI can result in increased efficiency, cost savings, and improved public services. These advancements could help tackle complex global problems affecting us now and into the future like climate change, poverty, and combatting disease.

Ultimately, if managed correctly, AI may bring forth immense societal and economic progress whilst mitigating the potential risks associated with the misuse of the technology.

Navigating the high seas of AI

This conversation about the most recent AI revolution is different from the one about Deep Blue in 1996. The rise of generative AI is truly an exploration into new and uncharted waters. We must understand the benefits and fears and think about the potential consequences for society as a whole. It is here to stay; even this piece is AI-assisted. But the best way to learn is by being curious and trying it out, even just asking it dumb questions to see what it’ll do.

Sites like Futurepedia add new AI tools to their directory every day; ChatGPT is soon to release its 4th iteration and has an official phone app. OpenAI’s playground gives further options to mess with the systems involved and Google’s AI test kitchen’s MusicLM can be an interesting experiment just to start.

AI represents a change at the trunk of the decision-making tree for businesses and private individuals alike. While not perfect; it’s moving fast and there is far more to know than I could include here. The possibilities seem to be endless and the immeasurability of this change is scary as it is exciting. It will soon begin to deeply change our lives. If we understand it; we may get to influence decide how to change them for the better.

Meet The London’s Lonely Girls Club

Isolation and the feeling of loneliness can play a huge factor in our well-being and mental health. It is also said that living within a city can make it feel more challenging to develop a feeling of community and a support network around you. 

According to the Reconceptualising Loneliness in London report, Londoners are more likely than others in the UK to be affected by severe forms of loneliness. 700,000 individuals within the city felt they experienced feelings of loneliness  ‘mostly’ or ‘all of the time’. That works out as about 1 in 12 of us. 

But there are people out there trying to make London that little bit less lonely. 

London’s Lonely Girls Club is a community of over 40,000 women set up to provide a safe space in London to create friendships and explore the city together. They run very regular monthly meet-ups which are both in person and online, from bank holiday picnics in Victoria Park to making your own boob clay pots- there really is something for everyone! 

I got in touch with Holly Cooke who is the The Founder of London Lonely Girls Club to find out more about why she felt the club was needed;  

Credit: London’s Lonely Girls Club website

Why did you feel there was a need for the London Lonely Girls Club?

I moved to London from my hometown of Stoke On Trent when I was 22 and I didn’t know anyone in the city. Although it had always been my dream to live and work in London, the reality was a little different when you were alone. I tried a couple of different apps when it came to meeting new people and making friends and through these quickly realised that I wasn’t alone in how I was feeling and there were so many others out there. From this the idea came to create a community and space, both physically and online, to help people connect in person and build friendships.

What advice would you give to women who feel isolated in London? 

Due to the fast-paced nature of London, and how transient it can feel with people constantly coming and going, it can feel particularly isolating. Especially if you don’t know many people or those you do know are in different life stages or have different interests from you.

For myself, when struggling with feelings of loneliness or isolation, I try and get out of the house and do something I enjoy, whether this is going to a food market or to the theatre. Learning to be alone and enjoy my own company and space was really difficult at first but was one of the most important things that helped me when it came to feeling lonely. The other is to connect with others! Whether this is through joining a community like The London Lonely Girls Club, or going along to something like a sports team or craft club, although scary, put yourself out there and meet new people. You never know who you might meet or the wonderful impact they could have on your life.

How have those who have joined found the experience?

We have incredible feedback from our members, and always love hearing their stories of the wonderful friendships and connections they’ve made! From meeting housemates to travel buddies, members forming book and walking clubs, to one person describing her experience as having met her “lifelong bestie”.

What words of wisdom would you give to women who are wanting to find their happiest selves? 

Finding yourself, who you are and what you love is so vital to happiness and contentment. Not forcing yourself to fit a specific box, stereotype or standard, but giving yourself the space and time to find and be who you really are is so key! 

We should all be concerned about the Online Safety Bill

  • WhatsApp, along with rival Signal, have united against the proposed Online Safety Bill (OSB) by the UK government, which they say could undermine the average UK citizen’s privacy and security.
  • In an open letter, they said,”…if implemented as written, [the OSB] could empower Ofcom to try to force the proactive scanning of private messages on end-to-end encrypted communication services, nullifying the purpose of end-to-end encryption as a result and compromising the privacy of all users.”
  • The OSB was proposed to try and improve internet safety, with many concerned about harmful content and its effects such as unfiltered access to adult sites by children, hate speech and internet fraud.
  • However, many have also expressed concern about the effects it could have on free speech. The OSB proposes to ‘restrain the publication of lawful but hateful speech’, which would effectively create a new form of censorship.
  • The OSB also does not provide explicit protection for end-to-end encryption – a technology that prevents anyone from seeing a message except the intended recipient – which could theoretically allow Ofcom free and unlimited scanning and monitoring of private messages whenever they deem it necessary.

Censorship by proxy

The OSB, whilst well-intentioned, should never be allowed to pass in Parliament.

It represents, fundamentally, the death of online privacy and an increase in censorship under the guise of ‘safety’.

This issue, compounded by further controversy about the limits of protest – which many believe to be an attack on the right to protest itself – is clearly indicative of the current government’s train of thought which, at worst, is not unlike dictatorships and authoritarian regimes in the past and present.

It would, in theory, be a ‘soft’ version of the Chinese political model, whereby the state knows all at all times and clamps down on dissent against it immediately.

The only difference would be the justification of having those powers.

The UK’s justification for wanting to curtail certain online liberties is in the name of safety. In other words, because crimes may occur online, nobody should have total digital autonomy.

It may seem logical and reasonable, but both recent and older history should remind us of the consequences of trusting governments blindly.

This is not to suggest that pro-privacy activists are advocating for unrestrained anarchy and lawlessness online but, unfortunately, the sad reality of this situation is that it opens the floodgates for mass surveillance.

Once states have unlimited access to its citizens’ private digital lives, society effectively becomes a Big Brother-like police state.

It runs the risk of those powers being abused by the authorities. The justification for surveillance would broaden from legitimate issues (such as organised crimes) into anything that the government deems to be ‘a risk’.

Then, all the government would have to do is weaponise the legislation against certain protests and political lobbies that it does not like. It would become farcical at best and authoritarian at worst.

At its core, the OSB is incompatible with liberal democracies. Any legislation that can be used to restrict (without moral or ethical justification) or entirely remove rights such as free speech and privacy simply cannot be allowed to pass in Parliament.

Director of ‘Academy of Ideas’ Claire Fox is strongly opposed to the OSB

What now?

Of course, these aren’t the only issues that the OSB will bring. Citizens would be at the mercy of the state’s interpretation of media, messages and information.

Many online companies who refuse to comply with it could be forced to remove its services from the UK entirely, which would have effects on the economy, academia, art, media and other industries.

An example of this is that Wikipedia could become inaccessible to UK users if issues with the OSB arise, according to The Guardian.

WhatsApp does not look to be calling the UK’s bluff and will uphold their threat to withdraw their services, which would be a political disaster for MPs, who use it as their main source of communication.

Public scrutiny could also be a factor as the perception of the OSB seems to be illiberal and impractical, having no purpose but to waste the time of policymakers and law enforcement whilst undermining certain freedoms.

The OSB is expected to come into force by 2024, with campaigns against it becoming more frequent and intense.

George Soros: An influential figure shaping global politics and philanthropy

An attack from the Twitter CEO has resulted in increased interest in George Soros’ work and interest.

The CEO of the Anti-Defamation League condemned Elon Musk’s comparison of Soros to Magneto — a Marvel villain who opposes humanity

Elon Musk made a series of attacks on George Soros overnight, tweeting that the Jewish-born investor and liberal philanthropist, who often is subject to virulent antisemitic conspiracy theories, hate humanity and “wants to erode the very fabric of civilization.”

Musk, who has overseen an increase in antisemitism and other hate speech on Twitter since he bought the social media platform last year, did not give a reason for singling out Soros. But he made his comments three days after Soros’s investment fund reported that it had sold all its stock in Tesla, the electric carmaker that Musk also runs.

Who is George Soros?

George Soros, a Hungarian-American billionaire, is a name that resonates in the worlds of finance, philanthropy, and politics. With a complex background and a vast fortune at his disposal, Soros has become one of the most influential individuals of our time. His impact spans continents, as he actively supports causes and organisations that promote human rights, democracy, and social justice. However, Soros’s influence is not without controversy, with critics questioning his motives and political agenda. This article delves into who George Soros is, his philanthropic endeavours, his political activities, and the reasons behind his significant global influence.

Early Life and Success in Finance

George Soros in 1992 JOHN GILES/GETTY IMAGES

Born in Budapest, Hungary, in 1930, George Soros survived the Nazi occupation during World War II and eventually emigrated to the United States. He attended the London School of Economics, where he studied philosophy and developed an interest in economics. Soros went on to establish his own hedge fund, Soros Fund Management, which propelled him to great financial success.

Soros gained widespread attention in 1992 when he famously bet against the British pound, earning him over a billion dollars and the nickname “the man who broke the Bank of England.” This achievement cemented his reputation as one of the most successful and influential investors in the world.

Philanthropic Ventures

Soros has dedicated a significant portion of his wealth to philanthropy. Through his Open Society Foundations (OSF), he supports numerous initiatives aimed at promoting democracy, human rights, and social justice worldwide. The OSF operates in over 100 countries and provides funding for organisations and projects that champion civil liberties, education, healthcare, and economic development.

One of Soros’s primary goals is to support democratic transitions and facilitate open societies in countries with repressive regimes. He played a pivotal role in Central and Eastern Europe after the fall of the Berlin Wall, providing financial assistance to promote democratic institutions and civil society organisations in the region.

Critics of Soros often accuse him of using his philanthropic activities to further his own political agenda. Nevertheless, the impact of his contributions cannot be ignored. From funding scholarships for marginalised students to supporting independent media outlets, his foundations have made a substantial difference in promoting human rights and social change.

Financier and philanthropist George Soros and his wife Tamiko Bolton attend the official opening of the European Roma Institute for Arts and Culture (ERIAC). Getty Images

Political Activities and Controversy

George Soros’s political activities have sparked controversy and fuelled conspiracy theories. He has openly expressed his opposition to populist movements and has funded organisations that advocate for progressive causes and policies. Soros has supported campaigns promoting criminal justice reform, LGBTQ+ rights, and environmental protection.

His support for political candidates, particularly in the United States, has drawn criticism from those who see his involvement as undue influence. Critics argue that Soros uses his financial resources to manipulate elections and shape political outcomes to align with his personal beliefs.

The controversy surrounding Soros has also fuelled anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Baseless claims and false narratives have circulated, often portraying him as a shadowy figure controlling global events. These conspiracies not only perpetuate harmful stereotypes but also divert attention from valid criticisms of his political activities.

Soros’s influence extends beyond his financial contributions. He has been actively involved in think tanks and policy organisations, engaging in debates on issues such as economic reform, globalisation, and human rights. His books and articles provide insights into his political philosophy and ideas on how societies can better promote equality and justice.

George Soros’s influence on the world stage is undeniable. Through his philanthropic ventures, he has championed causes that aim to improve the lives of marginalised communities and promote democratic principles. While critics question his motives and political agenda, his contributions have had a tangible impact on human rights, civil liberties, and social justice across the globe.

The police’s handling of the protestors during Coronation was unfair

  • Head of Republic campaign group calls for inquiry into officers’ conduct after those arrested later released without charge
  • Head of the anti-monarchy group Republic, Graham Smith, is considering legal action against the police
  • The Met announced it had arrested 64 people during the Coronation, including members of women’s safety groups handing out rape alarms
  • Ken Marsh, the chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation, said police acted “without fear or favour”
  • Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, in response to the backlash, said, “The police are operationally independent of government, they’ll make these decisions based on what they think is best”
  • The Metropolitan police have defended the arrest of anti-monarchy protesters during the coronation despite announcing that no charges will be brought against them.

A backlash was inevitable

The police’s handling of these protestors was fundamentally wrong. Their arrests represented naive policing at best, and a sign of more sinister things to come at worst.

Irrespective of an individual’s opinions on certain topics and/or political movements, the right to speak and protest must be upheld at all costs. Failure to safeguard these fundamental rights will descend into a slippery slope towards authoritarianism and fascism.

This case does, however, highlight the potential consequences of constantly pushing the boundaries of what constitutes free speech. Even the most open-minded liberal person would concede that political zealotism is not always the appropriate solution to issues.

In the last few years, protestors have become increasingly brazen, performing more outrageous stunts without fear of repercussions.

Anti-monarchist group Graham Smith voices his concerns about future peaceful protests

Examples include glueing themselves to roads (causing traffic for miles), defacing and vandalising public and private properties, stopping newspapers being delivered via van, climbing on top of London Underground carriages and even attempting to stop live air traffic at airports by flying drones into restricted airspace, all under the guise of free speech. This was never going to be sustainable long-term.

In fact, if reports are to be believed, the government received intelligence that certain protestors had ‘planned to disrupt the occasion [King’s Coronation] by creating a stampede of horses and covering the ceremonial procession in paint’.

It is possible, therefore, that police became too heavy-handed and arrested anybody they deemed to be a security risk or who posed a threat to the smooth operation of the day’s events.

This is a key issue with the Public Order Act 2023 (POA) is that it irks many people. It essentially gives the police the power to identify and deem any political movement as ‘disruptive’, which has the potential to be weaponised against certain groups.

Practically, it also makes it harder to distinguish political groups from one another, meaning innocent people can be arrested despite having committed no crime.

Labour MP Clive Lewis voices his concern about the Public Order Act 2023

Former Greater Manchester police chief Sir Peter Fahy gave evidence in Parliament that the new law was “poorly defined and far too broad”.

“This law could affect all sorts of protests in your local community, and this legislation could be used against you, and the police would be under pressure”, he said.

The cruel irony of this case has been laid bare for all to see. When political zealots push the boundaries under the guise of free speech, a resulting backlash will be inevitable, leaving society at large with less rights than they began with.

Like Covid, we have ended up with a medicine that will turn out to be worse than the disease.

What now?

It’s yet to be seen if Graham Smith, of Republic, will take legal action against the police. The Met has since expressed regret for the arrests but Mr Smith has rejected their apology.

The backlash against the police due to the arrests of the protestors is becoming more severe. Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana tweeted, “Whatever you think of the monarchy, the right to peaceful protest is fundamental to democracy. This is a chilling violation of that right.”

India becomes the biggest country in the world. The West must wake up

India has overtaken China in population, but its global ties remain complex

Last month the United Nations made a long-anticipated announcement: that India had become the most populous country on the planet. The state had finally beat China for the top spot for the first time since the global forum’s records began in 1950.

As India seems poised to reap this major demographic dividend, there remain huge questions and complexities influencing the US-India relationship as we tip-toe toward an uncertain global future, and the 2024 presidential race looms.

Does the West take India seriously enough?

The fact that it took the Biden administration two and a half years to appoint a new US ambassador to India already speaks to the unserious approach of the White House toward this key relationship.

Open criticisms of New Delhi have emerged afresh in the Biden era. The independent but influential government advisory body United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has clubbed India in the same category as North Korea, China and Saudi Arabia. This seems an odd choice given that India is a multicultural democracy, while the latter states are regimes which legally enshrine persecution, and in China’s case, is currently committing genocide against Turkic Muslims.

(Credit: Unsplash)

India’s religious dynamic is complex. Take the example of March’s state elections in which the Hindu nationalist BJP which currently oversees the central government swept to victory in 3 Christian-majority states in North East India. Quota systems and affirmative action programs of varying success are also in place to try to help historic minorities up and down the country, but tensions remain in some areas.

Given its prime geographic location and ample economic and military prospects, good ties with India will be indispensable if the US intends to seriously execute any long-term bulwark against China in the Indo-Pacific. Already India has been a leading player in efforts to rouse support against Beijing from non-western and developing nations.

The Soros Effect?

Still, the hesitance on the part of many Indian actors cannot be underestimated. Hindu nationalists have complained that US-based groups backed by Pakistan are attempting to impose sanctions on India, alongside grumblings-some justified, some less so- about progressive US lobbying groups such as the Open Society Foundation (OSF), headed by Hungarian-American philanthropist George Soros funding NGOs and institutions in India which New Delhi finds disruptive.

The Charles Léopold Meyer Foundation for the Progress of Humankind (FPH) is an NGO funded by the OSF network. The FPH reportedly has links to Indian individuals and NGOs that work towards fulfilling OSF’s interests in India, which are firmly planted against the current leadership.

Salil Shetty, Vice President of OSF and former Chief Executive of ActionAid, and Harsh Mander, former IAS officer and Action Aid (India) country director, have been identified as key Indian foot soldiers of OSF. To the chagrin of some, such actors have been involved in protests and activism in India, and Mander has been investigated over money laundering allegations and claims he indicted violence during the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Many Indian pundits are far from pleased at the presence of American-linked activism in their backyard, whether or not it is linked to Washington’s elected leaders.

Does culture clash?

As former British colonies and multicultural democracies, India and the United States have maintained ties since India’s independence in 1948. The two countries share many values, and common challenges such as terrorism and climate change and are certainly keen to work together to address them. However, there has always been a degree of tension and distrust between the two countries. 

By 1700 the Indian Subcontinent was the world’s largest economy, outstripping Qing China, and who can say whether it could reach these zeniths again? However India’s emerging power takes shape, it will remain strategically important to the US, especially regarding its plans to push back against Beijing.

Critiquing America’s rivals in the occasional op-ed or post-dinner talk is not going to cut it. US voters and pundits would do well to keep their eye on what candidates are proposing to expand or constrain in their ties with India, as well as their high-profile stances on growing tensions with China.

The US may have no choice but to continue its floundering approach to Beijing’s aggression if it does not invest better time and energy into a long-term strategy for its relations with New Delhi, especially given the obvious cultural political divisions between the pair.

Kashmiri terror survivors tell their stories at the UN


The United Nations has faced a barrage of criticism since its founding, and rightly so. Too frequently, the organisation panders to despots and dictators, hiding behind its mountain of cash and veneer of civility and cooperation. However last month the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) held a landmark session where survivors of some of the worst crimes were given space to air their thoughts.

At the UNHRC’s 52nd session, a host of Kashmiri voices new to the global stage spoke about their experience of the region at a time of great political change.

Participants included activist and erstwhile regional lawmaker Shuib Lone, social worker Tasleema Akhter and Bushra Mahajabeen, a survivor of a terror attack in which her sister died.

Lone highlighted that 2022 had been among the most peaceful years witnessed in the last three decades. Levels of terror attacks and recruitment have been decreasing in the wake of 2019’s series of constitutional changes and local government reforms.

In August 2019, the Indian-administered section of the Muslim-majority region had its special status revoked.

The status, included in India’s 1949 constitution, had bestowed the disputed province with a major chunk of decentralised autonomy. 


Photograph:(WION Web Team)

Since this major change 4 years ago, the state now operates as two territories intended to be unified with Indian territories, however, Ladakh is separately administered.

The reforms, which followed a wave of Pakistan-sponsored terror attacks, gave constitutional status to local self-governments across Rural & Urban areas and extended laws such as the Right to Education, Maintenance & Welfare of Parents & Senior Citizens Act, 2001, National Commission for Minority Act and acts for benefit of Women, Children, Disabled to the area.

Terrorist attacks also seem to have abated since August 2019, with Indian authorities claiming that the total figure of attacks almost halved from 496 compared to the 843 recorded in the 2 and a half years preceding the overhaul.

The session was also the first ever in which the families of terror casualties offered public testimony. Until a handful of years ago, the intimidation and threats such relatives lived in fear of made such public addresses highly dangerous, a climate that has somewhat stabilised. 

Both Lone and Akhter told the Human Rights Council that hybrid warfare with a global element remains a problem in the region. Lone highlighted that developments in Afghanistan and the Middle East are being used to feed online propaganda designed to radicalise Kashmiris and the South Asian diaspora online, including people in the UK.

Tasleema also discussed the region’s roaring cross-border drug trade. As terrorist networks have encountered increased barriers to instigating unrest in Jammu and Kashmir in recent years they have diverted funds into the drug trade. Young people are particularly vulnerable to this issue, with With 90 per cent of Kashmiri drug users being aged between seventeen and thirty-three years old.

One may hope that future global forums in which the region’s issues are explored through the voices of those on the ground will continue to improve its quality of life.

Transgender athletes ban is proof sport has become politics

  • World Athletics has banned transgender women from competing in the female category at international events
  • The governing body’s president, Lord Coe, said no transgender athlete who went through male puberty will be able to compete in female world ranking competitions from 31st March
  • Lord Coe added the decision was “guided by the overarching principle which is to protect the female category”
  • “Decisions are always difficult when they involve conflicting needs and rights between different groups, but we continue to take the view that we must maintain fairness for female athletes above all other considerations”, he said

Sport has become a political football

It is quite unfortunate that society has reached a stage where fairness and common sense have become symbols of political allegiance.

The decision to exclude transgender women – who are still physically and biologically male – from female competitions should (and will) be celebrated by female-born athletes and those who believe in fairness and sporting integrity.

Many would call this ruling discriminatory against transgender athletes, who see this as an attack on progressive values and a way to exclude transgender people from society at large.

Former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies welcomes the ruling

To these people, this isn’t a ruling based on the interests of fairness and biological reality; this is a ruling based on bigotry, discrimination and anti-trans rhetoric. This is a political battle.

Some would argue that the LGBT community have only themselves to blame, as they are seen to have made biological reality a political battlefield in which organisations and businesses must pick a side on pain of being labelled ‘transphobic’.

It is true that sport is segregated – and by definition, discriminatory – and for good reason.

Sport is discriminatory, but not based on hate as LGBT lobbies would have society believe.

The differences between male and female athletes are very real. Height, muscle, lung capacity and arm span length all have roles to play in athletes’ performances.

This is why sports are sex-segregated in the first place; to differentiate between male and female and ensuring there is a level playing field.

Attempting to include physically male athletes in female competitions eliminates fair competition. Some would argue it undermines the very existence of the female category itself.

Journalist and author Andy Ngô shares the story of a female cyclist who retired due to biological males competing against her

Therefore to call this ruling discriminatory is to call sex-segregated sport itself discriminatory which, in today’s political climate, seems to be an unforgivable sin.

It’s to suggest that rules based upon fairness, competition and biological reality should not exist if they refuse to indulge the sensitivities of the transgender lobby.

There is a narcissism about any political lobby or ideology that cannot or will not listen to reason. This is where ideology met reality; and in this case, reality won.

Sex is real, and it matters.

What now?

Lord Coe said the decision was open to being challenged and was not “written in stone” – but vowed World Athletics would to “vigorously defend” its position.

The ban has already been condemned by various LGBT charities, organisations and athletes.

Stonewall, in a tweet, said ‘It is so disappointing to see World Athletics announce a unilateral ban on trans women in track and field events.’

‘Their statement recognises that no trans women are competing at an international level and that they have no specific evidence to justify the ban.’

Some have proposed a new category of sport altogether, one in which transgender athletes are free to compete.

New report has shattered any confidence in London MET

An anticipated report has ‘excoriated’ the Metropolitan Police, according to The Guardian

After the murder of Sarah Everard by Wayne Couzens in 2021, a report was commissioned by the force, and uncovers whether failures by the Met result in institutional misogyny, racism and homophobia

Couzens, a former police constable, kidnapped, raped and strangled Everard before burning her body

It is thought that the report, written by Louise Casey, will illustrate her damning report against the Met with new case studies

The report highlights the fact that cases such as Couzens and David Carrick, a former police officer revealed to be a serial rapist, are not one-off, isolated incidents but instead a testament to how deep-rooted the Met’s failures are

The Met desperately needs cultural reform

This new report has shattered whatever remaining positive views certain people may have of the Metropolitan Police.

Even the most optimistic people can no longer deny that the Met Police is in desperate need of reform, both culturally and recruitment-wise.

Cases such as Couzens and Carrick prove that there is a deeper issue at the root of this situation, and the Met would do well to root it out as quickly as possible; not only for their reputations but for society at large.

If reports are to be believed, the police have even tried to evade public scrutiny by deleting case studies from their websites, including that of David Carrick.

This, along with the aforementioned cases and historical examples of racism and homophobia, paints a picture of the Met that does not fill a citizen with hope that interactions with them will always end amicably.

It erodes public trust and confidence in the force, which could lead to a rise in vigilantism. Why would a person use a service with such a bad reputation, and for good reason?

BBC Newsnight editor Sima Kotecha shares account of serving BAME Met officers

It leads people to see the police as enemies and not allies, which can lead to more confrontations and more unnecessary tragedy.

Citizens will begin to take the law into their own hands more frequently, which could lead to an increase in crime. Last year, West Midlands Police recorded the highest rate of knife crime offences (152 per 100,000).

It also raises questions about attitudes towards women, and whether or not the UK should deal with the skeletons in their own closets before pointing the finger at other countries and cultures.

UK media outlets are all too keen to allow public figures to criticise Qatar and other Middle Eastern countries for their alleged ‘bad’ treatment of women, despite cases such as Couzens and Carrick becoming commonplace.

One could speculate that this scandal is indicative of the existence of a wider cultural attitude towards women in the UK.

In any case, it seems the time has come to simply call a spade a spade. The Metropolitan Police is in desperate need of reform, and quickly; perhaps from independent oversight.

It needs to find its integrity, with societal cohesion at stake.

What now?

It is to be expected that serving officers found guilty of any form of misconduct as a result of the publication of this report will be dismissed.

The report has given the Met a simple but frank choice; “change itself”, or risk being broken up.

Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said he accepts the “diagnosis” of prejudice in the force, but would not use the term ‘institutional’ because he views it as ‘politicised’ and ‘ambiguous.’

The Guardian‘s Vikram Dodd has described this ordeal as ‘the fall of a British institution’.

London’s Metropolitan Police lets predators flourish, review concludes

London’s Metropolitan Police Service has allowed predatory behaviour to flourish within its force and failed to adequately protect members of the public from abuse, as well as its own female staff, according to a review that accused the organization of perpetuating a misogynistic, sexist, racist and homophobic internal culture.

“The Met has not protected its female employees or members of the public from police perpetrators of domestic abuse, nor those who abuse their position for sexual purposes,” read the 363-page report by Baroness Louise Casey, published on Tuesday.

“Despite the Met saying violence against women and girls is a priority, it has been treated differently from ‘serious violence.’ In practice, this has meant it has not been taken as seriously in terms of resourcing and prioritisation.”

Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said in a video statement on Tuesday that the force “fully accepts” the review’s findings and intends to act on them.

“I’m sorry we’ve let you all down, and we will fix this,” he vowed, citing a “turnaround” plan to address systemic issues within the force.

The United Kingdom’s largest police force came under intense scrutiny after Wayne Couzens, a serving Metropolitan Police officer, was convicted of the kidnapping, rape, and murder of Sarah Everard, a 33-year-old London woman in March 2021. The killing sparked a national conversation about the stark issues with policing.

One day after Couzens was sentenced that year, another serving officer, David Carrick, was arrested, accused of rape. He had joined the ranks of Britain’s worst serial sex offenders – later pleading guilty to raping multiple women over a period of almost two decades, again reigniting calls for urgent reform.

Grappling with the series of scandals and a growing crisis of trust, the Metropolitan Police then appointed Casey, a member of Britain’s House of Lords who has worked for years on social welfare, to lead an independent inquiry into its institutional culture and standards of behavior.

Her review began in February 2022. It paints a damning picture both of how seriously violence against women and girls is taken, and how crimes against them are investigated. “Instead of access to fast-track forensic services, officers have to contend with over-stuffed, dilapidated or broken fridges and freezers containing evidence including the rape kits of victims, and endure long waits for test results,” the review said.

Casey called the report “rigorous, stark and unsparing” in the foreword. When asked by Britain’s PA news agency whether there could be more officers like Couzens and Carrick in the force, she said: “I cannot sufficiently assure you that that is not the case.”

She called on the Metropolitan Police to reform itself, and said that far too many Londoners had lost faith in the force to protect them.

It is not our job as the public to keep ourselves safe from the police. It is the police’s job to keep us safe as the public,” Casey said in the foreword, pointing out that Carrick was not caught after action taken by the Metropolitan Police, but only after one of his victims came forward and reported him to the Hertfordshire Police – spurred to speak out by a statement made by Everard’s mother.

Baroness Casey: Source Parliament TV

Casey also said the Met should accept it is institutionally corrupt, as branded in 2021 by the official inquiry into the murder of the private eye Daniel Morgan, which the Met rejected.

The report said cultures of “blindness, arrogance and prejudice” are prevalent, and Casey added: “The Met can now no longer presume that it has the permission of the people of London to police them. The loss of this crucial principle of policing by consent would be catastrophic. We must make sure it is not irreversible.”

She added: “It is rot when you treat Londoners in a racist and unacceptable fashion. That is rotten.”

Keir Starmer, the leader of the Labour party, said: “The racist, sexist and homophobic abuses of power that have run rife in the Metropolitan police have shattered the trust that Britain’s policing relies on and let victims down.

“For 13 years there has been a void of leadership from the Home Office, which has seen Britain’s policing fall far below the standards the public have the right to expect.”

Home Office officials insist they have put police reform measures in place. Suella Braverman, the home secretary – who with Khan appointed the commissioner, backed Rowley: “It is clear that there have been serious failures of culture and leadership in the Metropolitan police.

“I will continue to hold the commissioner to account to deliver a wholesale change in the force’s culture.”

Harriet Wistrich, of the Centre for Women’s Justice, said Casey’s findings were “without precedent in its unswerving criticism of a corrupt, institutionally racist, misogynistic and homophobic police force”.

She said the two government inquiries after the Couzens scandal should be given greater powers and placed on statutory footing.

Budget 2023: the most important points from Jeremy Hunt’s speech

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has unveiled the contents of his first Budget in the House of Commons.

It had a focus on prompting those who have left their jobs to return to the workforce, and boosting business investment.

Here is a summary of the main announcements.

Taxation and wages

  • Cap on amount workers can accumulate in pensions savings over their lifetime before having to pay extra tax (currently £1.07m) to be abolished
  • Tax-free yearly allowance for pension pot to rise from £40,000 to £60,000 – having been frozen for nine years
  • Fuel duty frozen – the 5p cut to fuel duty on petrol and diesel, due to end in April, kept for another year
  • Alcohol taxes to rise in line with inflation from August, with new reliefs for beer, cider and wine sold in pubs
  • Tax on tobacco to increase by 2% above inflation, and 6% above inflation for hand-rolling tobacco
line

Energy

  • Government subsidies limiting typical household energy bills to £2,500 a year extended for three months, until the end of June
  • £200m to bring energy charges for prepayment meters into line with prices for customers paying by direct debit – affects 4m households
  • Commitment to invest £20bn over next two decades on low-carbon energy projects, with a focus on carbon capture and storage
  • Nuclear energy to be classed as environmentally sustainable for investment purposes, with promise of more public funding
  • £63m to help leisure centres with rising swimming pool heating costs, and invest to become more energy efficient
line

Jobs and work

  • 30 hours of free childcare for working parents in England expanded to cover one and two-year-olds, in a bid to help them work more
  • Families on universal credit to receive childcare support up front instead of in arrears, with the £646-a-month per child cap raised to £951
  • £600 “incentive payments” for those becoming childminders, and relaxed rules in England to let childminders look after more children
  • New fitness-to-work testing regime to qualify for health-related benefits
  • Funding for up to 50,000 places on new voluntary employment scheme for disabled people, called Universal Support
  • Tougher requirements to look for work and increased job support for lead child carers on universal credit
  • More places on “skills boot camps” to encourage over-50s who have left their jobs to return to the workplace
  • Immigration rules to be relaxed for five roles in construction sector, to ease labour shortages
line

Economy and public finances

  • Office for Budget Responsibility predicts the UK will avoid recession in 2023, but the economy will shrink by 0.2%
  • Growth of 1.8% predicted for next year, with 2.5% in 2025 and 2.1% in 2026
  • UK’s inflation rate predicted to fall to 2.9% by the end of this year, down from 10.7% in the last three months of 2022
  • Underlying debt forecast to be 92.4% of GDP this year, rising to 93.7% in 2024
line

Business and trade

Port of Felixstowe
  • Main rate of corporation tax, paid by businesses on taxable profits over £250,000, confirmed to increase from 19% to 25%
  • Companies with profits between £50,000 and £250,000 to pay between 19% and 25%
  • Companies able to deduct investment in new machinery and technology to lower their taxable profits
  • Tax breaks and other benefits for 12 new Investment Zones across the UK, funded by £80m each over the next five years
  • Reduced paperwork for international traders, who will also be given longer to submit customs forms under streamlined rules
line

Other measures mentioned

  • Commitment to raise defence spending by £11bn over the next five years
  • Prison sentences for those convicted of marketing tax avoidance schemes
  • An extra £10m over next two years for charities helping to prevent suicide
  • Streamlined approvals process promised for new medical products
  • £900m for new super computer facility, to help UK’s AI industry

“My innocence is being tossed around as if it were a toy” – Image-Based sexual abuse

You may have seen in the news the topic of Image-Based Sexual Abuse being discussed on social media. This is after reality TV star Stephen Bear was jailed last week for 21 months. Stephen shared a private and sexual video online without the consent of his ex-partner.

In 2020, Stephen shared a CCTV footage video of himself and Love Island star, Georgia Harrison, having sex on his Only Fans account. Georgia stated she was unaware it had been filmed at the time. When she discovered the footage, she made it clear the content was not to be shared. Georgia was ignored and Stephen went on to not only share the footage but to profit from the content.

He was convicted of voyeurism and two counts of disclosing private, sexual photographs and films. He has been placed on the Sex Offenders Register for ten years.

What are we talking about

Intimate Image Abuse is the act of sharing intimate images or videos of someone, either on or offline, without their consent with the intention of causing distress. This is against the law and is included in the Criminal Justice and Courts Act (2015).

This criminal offence has often been referred to as ‘revenge porn’ in the past but this can indicate that the victim has done something wrong in the first place for someone to be seeking ‘revenge’.

Following concerns raised by campaigners and Parliamentarians, the Government created a new criminal offence to ensure that this behaviour is fully captured by the criminal law.

The new offence is within section 33 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. The offence is triable either way and punishable with a maximum sentence of 2 years imprisonment.

Source: Unsplash

But how big of an issue is this?

CPS data revealed in total 825 suspects were charged with 1,048 Image-based sexual abuse offences between April 2020 and June 2022.

A study was also conducted by The Guardian where FOI requests revealed 541 of the victims were underage between January and December 2019.  The distribution of sexually explicit images or videos with the intent to cause harm was reported to 36 police forces in England and Wales. The average age of the victim was 15.

Sarah Green, Director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition said; “These numbers are really worrying because they’re the incidents reaching the police while many other instances of this nasty, abusive behaviour will not,”

Although numbers and statistics can show the extent of a problem, it is people’s stories which can show the true impact it has on an individual’s life.

What happens to the victims

I spoke to a victim of Image-Based Sexual Abuse who wanted to share their story. They wished to remain anonymous.

“I was 16. I’d just come out of a 9-month relationship with an 18-year-old guy. I had been talked into sending nudes on Snapchat by him, I didn’t want to but he reassured me they’d get deleted. A few months after I was rid of him my phone went off. It is a snap video from a guy in the same year as my ex, I opened it not thinking it was much as it was before ‘stories’ were a thing, so people would just send random things to their entire contact list. When I opened it my stomach did more than sink.”

“It was a video of my ex, in a car full of people from school replaying my private photos, laughing, as he was flicking through them as if it were a joke. There was an app called ‘snapsave’ and if you were on this app when someone sends you a Snapchat it would save it automatically as if you had just received them and could watch and replay them on that app, and the sender would have no idea. I felt hollow and so vulnerable, I could not believe what I was seeing. My innocence is being tossed around as if it were a toy.”

“I never told anyone, I felt completely ashamed of myself and felt it was my fault and that it didn’t matter because people experience much worse. The thought of my parents finding out that I had put myself in such a vulnerable position made me feel even more ashamed, I knew better. I have no idea why his mate sent me that video, or what his intentions were but I’m glad he did, just so I knew.”

You do not need to suffer in silence.

After Stephen Bear was found guilty of his crimes, Georgia Harrison released a statement outside court to others who have been victims of this horrific crime.

“I want all other victims of this crime to know that I stand in solidarity with them and I have absolutely no regrets about waiving my anonymity.”

“I hope this puts anyone off committing this sort of crime and I hope for anyone else who’s been a victim of it, it gives them some sort of justice.”

Where can I seek advice and help?

I spoke to The Egalitarian, a group with the mission to raise awareness of inequality to encourage social change and empower victims of gender-based violence.

“Firstly, we want to emphasize that it’s never the person who’s been affected’s fault. We want to echo the importance of reporting the incident to the police, as more reporting leads to more leads, to more investigations and data further. Hopefully, leading to more prevention of image-based sexual abuse in the first place.”

“Reach out to violence against women and girls organisations. This is such a distressing topic and a harrowing experience for anybody. Looking for support after sexual violence whether this be from friends and family or qualified counsellors is crucial so you don’t feel alone.

The Egalitarian are also available for those looking for more information or support below.